Hidekifan55

I'm kind of in the same boat as you, CJ, on this one. BA has their place and they do some things real well, while others not so much. Their strength is their depth of info on players, but that info is stretched very thin and is far too general. And, yes, they have proven to be wrong on many many things. I don't know if they slipped, but in fact maybe that people just noticed their mistakes more because there is more places to get info on prospects now.

From what I understand, this is something he's seen for a long time. And, I can't argue either way because I've only seen Heyward play once in person plus some limited video. But, you are 100% right...essentially "beauty is in the eye of the beholder" for each team.

No problem. Now, like someone said, I don't know if this hold water or not, BUT I don't know if I want my team taking a guy that at least some scouts think have serious, serious holes as a top 15 pick. I think I'd want to be safer than that.

So everyone knows, I wrote the article with the Heyward quote. I was more shocked than anyone I think. I asked in hope that I'd hear him say Washington had interest at #6. But, supposedly, the crosschecker I spoke to has seen him several times and there's many who agree with him apparently. I made some calls yesterday to look into it. Even though I really like him still, the quote worries me.