H0FFY, I thought I was on top of this thread before you posted. I have to assume a chook is an x-factor you inserted/invented/learned down under. Good on you, mate. Also want to point out that while Pujols, every year, has by any standard definition crushed, raked, been a great hitter, or what-have-you, he has not performed identically every year. His statistics fluctuate like anyone elses. Thus, while it's easy to say that he'll be good, it's only so easy because his margin of error is so huge: he would have to drop off substantially and "unpredictably" just to be not-great. And a crazy insane drop off would be required before anyone started calling him, say, Albert Poo Holes, whereas normal fluctuations might be more noticeable in a player who barely has his head above water, so to speak. There are many more players (many) who tread this line than there are Albert Pujolses (one).