So we are not allowed to take into account how Sexson has done since the trade - but we are suppose to consider how the players we obtained in the trade have performed? That doesn't make any sense. You cannot judge a trade on the day it happens. The only thing you can look at is the final results. I would rather have Capuano, Overbay, Bush, Ohka, Spivey, Counsell, Gross etc. for several seasons than one season of Sexson. Maybe I should start speaking Chinese so you understand clearer. The Brewers traded a 28-year old all-star first baseman coming off a .272/45/124 year with an OBP of .379 and SLG of .548. In fact, his 2 previous years were pretty similiar. So 3 years of an established player coming into his peak years. They were not, no matter how much you want to believe it, trading the .205/.295/.399 player of 2007. As I said, coming into his peak years (most people say peak years are between 28-32). Overbay was a below average league first baseman. (I saw a stat where in 2005, he ranked 13-15 in most categories among first baseman). I won't get into another debate over Crapuano. Spivey played 108 mediocre games for the Brewers, Ohka was 11-13 with a 96 ERA+, Counsell played one year before leaving as a FA, Gross sucks and was traded for almost a non-prospect in A ball, Bush is a #5 starter. If you think that's fair value, that's fine. I think Melvin got hosed on the deal. And a lot of people said so at the time. Those that didn't drink the koolaid or were impressed by the quantity.