Heck I'll dive in. I enjoy some of the stat related posts and I've learned a lot. It has forced me to think about a player or an issue from a different angle, which is a good thing. Some of Rluzinski posts have been very eye opening, for example. And I agree that sometimes your eyes lie to you about a player. I do form an opinion about a player and then use certain at bats to "prove" my theory. Wes Helms is having a pretty good year. I can now admit that. For 4 months every junk AB he had "proved" my theory that he was junk. Low and behold I looked at a bunch of stats and he is having a good season. I was looking at the 7 out of 10 outs he made not the 3 out of 10 hits. What I hate is when someone says that we need to upgrade at position X. A good discussion ensues, then some clown says "how could you say he's bad defensively, his range factor is...." Or "he's a good hitter because his VORP is ..." There was a good discusion about contracts, age, players in the minors, amount of money that's available, free agents available and someone throws VORP at me. That's where I tune out big time. I understand VORP and Range Factor and the rest and think they are useful but not the end all. I personally think that stats do not do justice to defense. They carry the same weight with me as Gold Gloves do. Which is not much. I do like OPS and OXS. What I really like is the quick 300 400 500 Ave Obp Slg rule. One glance and I can tell how good a guy is. I also beleive clutch exists. RLuzinski's great article showed that you couldn't prove it with the stats. But I think that there are certain players you want to have at the plate if your year is on the line. Just like you would want a certain QB under center, or a certain golfer to make a putt. Can you prove that one person has it and one person doesn't? Nope. But like the Supreme Court said about porn, you know it when you see it. You can manufacture a stat to try to show it (eg 4th quarter comebacks in football) but they lack the rigor to be relevant. I guess that's my biggest complaint about the stat guys, rigor and relevance. If you have those, like you do with OPS or OXS, then you have something. If not, well... I just reread this post and its all over the place and a little harsh. I hope not to offend anyone, that much http://forum.brewerfan.net/images/smilies/smile.gif . But as a long time lurker here I have learned a bunch and finally just wanted to throw my two cents in. All the best J