And I'll ask one more time still...for what purpose? I don't understand your stance here, Naivin. I'm thoroughly convinced that Ned's world of rainbows and butterflies that he portrays to the media is exactly the way he manages behind closed doors. What evidence do you have to prove otherwise? A nice, well rounded collapse after a hot start last season, and many, many mediocre seasons prior to that? I don't WANT to hear "Soup pitched well tonight" when his line is 5 IP, 9 H, 5 ER. Because that's a false statement. He didn't pitch well. Either that, or we get "we didn't give this game away, the [insert team here] just earned it." He used that one after a Fielder error led to a Dodgers victory the other night, right along with a Mota blown save. So, if logical connections can be made, if we didn't blow it, they just played better than we did, is Ned telling the media (and his players) that other teams are just better than we are, and that's why we continue to lose and they continue to beat us? That's not the message I want my manager giving his players. I like Ned Yost. I think he's a good guy. I just think he's way too soft of a manager for this team. I don't know who would be a suitable replacement, but I've finally come to the conclusion that we're never going to win anything of consequence with Ned at the helm. And since we don't have the money to hold on to ALL of these players, our window for success will never be that large. Luckily, Gamel and LaPorta will bring more fire power, and the window may be open for a few more years. So you ask for what purpose? Well, we can keep doing what we're doing. Not make any changes. Keep pretending nothing is wrong. And at the end of the year when we're battling for 5th place in the NL Central, you can begin asking yourself what is wrong with that picture. In the mean time, I WILL support Ned because he's my manager and the Brewers are my team. But I'll continue to disagree with how he runs this team. EDIT: Why are there no spaces in my paragraphs? This looks all jumbled and it isn't supposed to be... EDIT AGAIN: Nevermind, didn't realize we were using HTML.