Jump to content
Brewer Fanatic
  • New Home Park with the Brewers Could Mean a Power Surge for Brian Anderson


    Tim Muma

    The Brian Anderson signing wasn't a big splash for the Milwaukee Brewers, but they are likely banking on his power returning in 2023, which would increase his value and strengthen the lineup. The two biggest keys for the 29-year-old's resurgent power will be a new home ballpark and improved health.

    Image courtesy of © Scott Taetsch-USA TODAY Sports

    Brewers Video

    Between 2019-2020, Brian Anderson had a 162-game average slash line of .260/.343/.467/.811 (114 OPS+), including 35 doubles and 27 homers. No one should expect nearly 30 home runs from him in a single season, but it speaks to his potential. In the past two seasons, a left shoulder injury has played a part in sapping his power; however, the Milwaukee Brewers must also believe his previous home ballpark played a more significant role in the dip in pop. The switch in stadiums could have the same effect it had on Travis Shaw when he came to Milwaukee, which was an enormous boon for the player and the club.

    LoanDepot Park, home of the Miami Marlins, ranks as the seventh-worst park to hit home runs for right-handed hitters. Statcast's three-year rolling average rates LoanDepot Park at an 86 for right-handed homers, where 100 is "average." Not ideal for a hitter like Anderson. Meanwhile, American Family Field sits at 112 for righties, the seventh-best home run haven in MLB. That's a good way to jumpstart a turnaround.

    When the Brewers traded for Travis Shaw (who recently retired), Milwaukee saw a similar potential power tick by changing ballparks. Shaw had 34 doubles and 16 homers in his last season with the Boston Red Sox with a .421 slugging percentage and .726 OPS (90 OPS+). At the time, Fenway Park was the third-worst home run park for left-handed hitters (73), while Miller Park was the best for lefties (143). Milwaukee's power projection paid off as Shaw would hit 31 and 32 homers in the next two seasons with the Brewers, posting an. 862 OPS (121 OPS+) and .825 OPS (119 OPS+) in those years. Yes, the Fenway-to-Miller Park gap was larger than the Miami-to-Milwaukee transition, but the concept remains.

    Below is Anderson's 2022 spray chart overlayed on American Family Field. This doesn't mean all the hits translate perfectly, and not all of Anderson's balls in play came in Miami, of course. However, this can offer a visual hope for what could be in 2023.
    Anderson 2022 spray shart amfam.JPG
    You could potentially count nine additional home runs at American Family Field, three of which were outs in 2022. We also can't know how the outfielders might be positioned differently in Milwaukee versus Miami, meaning some flyouts might otherwise find space to land. Yes, this leans on the optimistic side, but there's no doubt it's a plus move for Anderson.

    The other vital component for Anderson's power to return would be improved health. In his introduction to Brewers' media, he acknowledged that his shoulder issues in the past two seasons impacted his offense. With just a few weeks before Spring Training, Anderson is feeling a bounceback in the making.

     

    Several of Anderson's batted ball metrics in 2022 improved toward his 2019 figures, which was his best season. That could indicate the injury and some loss of strength he suffered in 2021 made less of an impact last season, and 2023 could mean even greater things.

    Anderson Batted Balls.JPG

    As you can see from the chart, Anderson saw a return of barrels and hard-hit balls, but the launch angle sunk. As many Brewers fans know, thanks to Christian Yelich, when a hitter can't get the ball off the ground consistently, his exit velocity means less. But Anderson's launch angle struggles could be attributed to his shoulder issue and the climb to being "normal" again. Anderson alluded to increasing his bat speed this offseason. With slower bat speed last year, he was likely late on more pitches than usual, leading to more ground balls as contact was made deep in the hitting zone. Whether he never adjusted his timing to having a slower bat or needed to catch up to increased velocity, starting a new season with a quicker swing might be enough to rediscover a better launch angle in 2023.

    Could the combination of a better home run park and improved health be enough to make Anderson a secret weapon in Milwaukee's lineup? If you go by Steamer's projections of .226/.308/.373/.681 and 13 homers, it won't seem like much of an improvement over last season. But if the park factor and a fresh start are catalysts to boost his numbers 10-20 percent above those projections, now you're onto something. Somewhere in the neighborhood of .254/.341/.442/.783 with 17 home runs would lengthen the Brewers' lineup and generate consistent offensive production.

    The more improvement Anderson shows early in the season, the more playing time he will get. Increasing his plate appearances creates more opportunities to hit the ball out of the yard. Of course, that requires good health as well. If those factors come together in 2023, it's a jackpot acquisition for the Brewers. Though signing Anderson didn't garner headlines across the league, it is the move good teams often make to complement the talent already in place.

    Think you could write a story like this? Brewer Fanatic wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    MORE FROM BREWER FANATIC
    — Latest Brewers coverage from our writers
    — Recent Brewers discussion in our forums
    — Follow Brewer Fanatic via Twitter, Facebook or email

    • WHOA SOLVDD 1
     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Featured Comments

    9 hours ago, Miller Park Minute said:

    This is great info on the new Ba! I love the layover of the spray chart

    I feel like granular park effect is something we talk about a fair amount in baseball but rarely dig into the specifics. Like "this player pulls to right-center, how does that play in Park X?" Not "right field is short" or whatever but the actual spray charts and specifics.

    It's one of the reasons I so like the Twitter account (with the most absurd name ever) "Would It Dong".

    https://twitter.com/would_it_dong

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    You are way too generous with the potential of homers added compared to last year. As you mention not all are at Marlins Park...but about half of them are borderline on the wall. Most homers are going to end up 5-10 feet beyond the wall distance...or they will hit the wall. 

    Baseball Savant Videos | baseballsavant.com (mlb.com) Not a homer at AmFam

    Baseball Savant Videos | baseballsavant.com (mlb.com) I don't think this is far enough over to be a homer, likely off the wall

    Baseball Savant Videos | baseballsavant.com (mlb.com) Not a homer at AmFam

    Baseball Savant Videos | baseballsavant.com (mlb.com) 392 feet to center...not going to be a homer at AmFam

    Arguably none of those 9 borderline homeruns would fair any better at Miller Park. The two deepest in centerfield were 403 feet. You aren't hitting a 403 foot homer at Miller Park. Below is what 411 feet in centerfield looks like:

    Baseball Savant Videos | baseballsavant.com (mlb.com)

    Baseball Savant Videos | baseballsavant.com (mlb.com)

     

    Even if he were to benefit homerun wise, is that just going to be negated with a less generous outfield to sneak in doubles and dump singles into the open grass? 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Tim Muma
  • Brewer Fanatic Contributor
  • Posted

    2 hours ago, MrTPlush said:

    You are way too generous with the potential of homers added compared to last year. As you mention not all are at Marlins Park...but about half of them are borderline on the wall. Most homers are going to end up 5-10 feet beyond the wall distance...or they will hit the wall. 

    Baseball Savant Videos | baseballsavant.com (mlb.com) Not a homer at AmFam

    Baseball Savant Videos | baseballsavant.com (mlb.com) I don't think this is far enough over to be a homer, likely off the wall

    Baseball Savant Videos | baseballsavant.com (mlb.com) Not a homer at AmFam

    Baseball Savant Videos | baseballsavant.com (mlb.com) 392 feet to center...not going to be a homer at AmFam

    Arguably none of those 9 borderline homeruns would fair any better at Miller Park. The two deepest in centerfield were 403 feet. You aren't hitting a 403 foot homer at Miller Park. Below is what 411 feet in centerfield looks like:

    Baseball Savant Videos | baseballsavant.com (mlb.com)

    Baseball Savant Videos | baseballsavant.com (mlb.com)

     

    Even if he were to benefit homerun wise, is that just going to be negated with a less generous outfield to sneak in doubles and dump singles into the open grass? 

    I think I was clear on this not being an A -> B type of thing. There are multiple factors, including how the ball travels in each stadium, weather, roof open/closed, trajectory of balls, etc. That would obviously be a much deeper dive and I felt a bit too much (at this point). Hence, focusing on the Statcast rolling ballpark factors  with its three-year averages for HRs for righties is the main key. 

    I appreciate you taking a more specific look at those "potential" homers. In generally, I just wanted to give people a quick visual, as basic as it is. I do believe 16-18 homers are well within range for Anderson, and I wasn't basing it off of those "nine more potential homers" with the spray chart. It's more about overall impact of the home park, plus more plate appearances with better health to boot.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...