Whenever I read something like this, it never feels like the expenses an organization has to cover are taken into account, either. When you say "making", is that based on profit or just income/revenue?
The Packers, one of the few professional teams forced to disclose their books annually due to being publicly held, operated at a slight loss in 2026 despite huge advantages in shared TV money and a more nationwide following. Them playing in a league with a salary cap tied to what the NFL brings in revenue-wise is a much different way to operate a franchise without worrying about longterm sustainability to run a team with increasing player payroll with contracts that are fully guaranteed - let alone remaining competitive when the financial playing field is equal for onfield players and one franchise QB can automatically guarantee you an annual postseason shot.
Based on recent events in the news, I'd imagine the Dodgers books look like a singed and crumpled up 9th grade book report gone wrong with how cooked they probably are. And that's the team primarily driving the explosion in revenue disparity across MLB - what percentage of it is actually above-board is highly debatable at this point.