Jump to content
Brewer Fanatic

dlk9s

Verified Member
  • Posts

    10,654
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

 Content Type 

Profiles

Forums

Blogs

Events

Milwaukee Brewers News, Rumors & Analysis

2026 Milwaukee Brewers Top Prospect Rankings

Milwaukee Brewers Videos

2022 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Milwaukee Brewers Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Milwaukee Brewers Fan Guides & Resources

2023 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2024 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

The Milwaukee Brewers Players Project

2025 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2026 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by dlk9s

  1. I'm not saying by any means that collisions should be done away with, but I really have never understood why it's ok to destroy the catcher but not players covering other bases. Because he has a chest protector? It's not like his gear is very strong or offers much coverage. He's not protected like a football player. Collisions are something I've always accepted and, frankly, are pretty exciting, but every so often I've wondered why they are allowed.
  2. You're not understanding his proposition. He's not assuming any team maintains its current pace. He's just asking if you'd be willing to guarantee a record of 81-69 at the 150 game mark. Obviously if every team maintained its current pace the Brewers would miss the playoffs. There wouldn't be a question to pose, then.
  3. With two outs, this is the way it should be. Even if we get thrown out half the time, the odds of scoring are STILL way way better than sitting at 3rd and hoping to get hit in. Oh, not criticizing the decision, just making an observation.
  4. Just saw the replay of the YuBet double. We've got to lead MLB in close plays at the plate.
  5. Betancourt is actually replacing McGehee in a double-switch. Counsell is sliding over to 3B.
  6. I saw "In play, run(s)" and got pretty scared. I'll accept the sac fly for now.
  7. Last night I noticed on the concourse TV that Todd was warming up and I wondered, "if they use him will he sprint out and be timed?" So it's cool that they did. Classy, in fact. Take note, STL. The Cardinals players, coaches, executives, and fans probably think the sprint and the timer mean that Coffey and the team are making a mockery of the game.
  8. Part of me wants Coffey to strike Casey out. Nothing but love for the guy.
  9. Gameday color coded the second pitch as a strike (it was the one I commented on above), but apparently, it was a ball, as that's what is shown in the pitch-by-pitch list.
  10. Yikes, Gameday shows the first strike to Braun as way inside.
  11. So I left to go pick up my son at pre-school and lo and behold, Zack hits a jack. Very nice!
  12. Well, looks like the ump might have a small strike zone today. 3-4 pitches of Grienke's walk could have been called strikes. They weren't no-doubters, but according to Gameday, they hit the corners.
  13. He hit 10 as a Brewer. The last catcher to hit more than ten as a Brewer is pretty obscure.Eddie Perez hit 11 in 2003.
  14. I think I'm just going to use this one to cancel out the first game of the season.
  15. I was just staring at my screen praying to see "In play, out(s)."
  16. The one time you want Desmond to lay off a pitch in the dirt... EDIT: Screw you, MLB.com live look-in! Just let me finish the game!
  17. Phew. I was thinking the one thing we don't want (aside from a homer) is to let the leadoff guy on. With the Nats speed coming up this inning plus Werth due up 4th, that's the last thing we wanted. 2 more, Ax Man.
  18. How about calling it a good job by everybody involved plus a little good fortune?
  19. I can't wait to see the replay on MLB.com - sounded like an interesting play.
×
×
  • Create New...