Truth be told, Drew could have done the traditional "avoid, avoid, avoid" tactic he does on harder questions. But he didn't. So, like the Haudricourt chat on BA from a few years ago, where Tom exploded at someone for questioning his credibility, he decided to answer it in an incredibly out-of-line way. Drew chooses what questions he does and does not answer. Bottom line. Yes, I could have been more tactful. Yes, I could have come up with a better location. But that does not change the issue of Drew and professionalism. Quite frankly, if I was Gary Howard and I read Drew Olson's chat, I'd have a long talk with him. Those sorts of responses are, at best, unacceptable and at worst, a fireable offense. Did I ask Drew anything about opium? Absolutely not. And quite frankly, madbad and others, I'm offended that it was even implied. Someone obviously *did* and sorry if I'm suspect #1 but... others *have* talked about Drew's opium habit on this site in the past. I just thought it was funny that Drew even mentioned it in a chat... further exemplifying his lack of professionalism.