Metrics like BABIP are interesting, and can be very useful. But they should not be the be all end all, and I think too often people rely on them too heavily. When someone are saying that Lucroy "should not be moved up in the order because he's going to fall back to his .260 average of last year"....really? If his AVG does fall to .260, isn't that a lot better than the .164 average Weeks has, and the .192 average Morgan has right now? Lucroy has had a lot of clutch hits this season. How many clutch hits have Morgan and Weeks had combined? They may come around, and I pray to God they do (or we're in for a long season). But they may not. How long do we wait before we try something new? In a perfect world, we could point to past statistics, and use them as the justification for everything. But reading between the lines tells us that Jonathan Lucroy is only in his second year as a starter. He has less than 800 career at bats. Young hitters mature, just as veterans eventually tail off. Right now, Lucroy is the team's second best hitter. If his BABIP is up, can we really say that "he's only getting lucky, and that he's hitting the same number of ground balls, they're just going through" Or, is he getting better at controlling where the batted ball goes? Maybe if Lucroy is moved up to the two spot, he flops. The way I look at it, he's been hot, and while that may or may not continue, we can't be any worse off with Lucroy near the top of the order, and we may be better. We just don't know how he'd respond to being moved up so much. Many Brewer fans might be surprised by just how good a hitter he becomes. He makes contact, and if it means Luc batting #2 gives us a few extra runners on base and in scoring position for Ryan Braun and A Ram...why not give it a go? He can always be moved back.