Even for the rare pitchers (true Aces) whose numbers hold up 2nd and 3rd times through a batting order, they become more useful when you can use them in high leverage roles 2-3 times every 5 games as opposed to just 1 every 5. When a middle reliever limited to one trip through the order posts the same sub .600 OPS that Scherzer does, you can now find more useful ways to have a Scherzer impact more games. Now obviously the real Max Scherzer is not likely to transition from an Ace to a mere out getter. This is going to take time to implement. And the last places to embrace this will be the big markets. Big ticket #1s will continue to migrate to the biggest markets. But as small markets embrace the effective subdivided use of their entire 12 man staffs, and benefit from the result, the idea of forcing yourself into a 5-man rotation when you're lucky if you have even 1 guy capable of going deep into a game effectively, is foolish pursuit. As the number of pitchers called upon to pitch 5-7 innings dwindles, pitchers will be groomed for 2-3 inning, more frequent appearances. Statistically, more than 80% of MLB starting pitchers have no business being counted on to go deep into games. So the question is, why make them? It will take time to transition, but it's a foregone conclusion when the current model has most starters allowing MVP-like batting numbers when they face a lineup twice. Especially when every arm on the roster is statistically more likely to post a better result coming in fresh.