RobertR

The message he's sending is that the Bears' secondary blows.

The only thing the Bears have going for them on offense is Swift. That might be enough.

The only thing the Bears have going for them on offense is Swift. That might be enough.

I'll take the win, but it sure doesn't make me feel better about this team

I'm beyond tired of all the undisciplined dumb penalties that put the Packers in more difficult situations and the inevitable results.

Are the Badgers good?

There's always Johnny Bullpen as an option. Arguably a pretty good one.

I suppose there are stakes for Gasser. 4 good innings and he's starting in the post-season.

I went to the movies. I wonder how the Packers are doing. Oh.

We know how this ends. Tie it up and watch the Jets drive, helped by dumb penalties, for a late game winning score.

The Packers might win, but my expectations for this team are cratering. Why did they extend MLF again

So far the MVP is the punter.

A few more games like yesterday and I'm going to the movies on Sundays instead of watching the NFL.

There's a difference between aggressive and stupid. I don't think LaFleur knows the difference.

I think my main point is that we shouldn't straight out dismiss it with "you can't do it" when it's a little more complicated than that. Infeasible I think is the more accurate statement. I know engineers like to spec brand new materials due to liability and other reasons but I've been hearing a lot lately about reusing foundation elements. There's a lot of testing that's supposed to happen before you do so. OTOH, in situ testing has advanced by leaps and bounds. It may be that the foundation element of wind generation is overstated and the lifetime with reuse is much longer than currently thought. My understanding is that they reused foundation elements last time they reworked 794, for example.