Jump to content
Brewer Fanatic

Game 5: Packers @ Rams - Sunday, Oct 6th at 3:25PM


Posted
3 minutes ago, HarryDoyle said:

Heads up by Wicks to stay in bounds. Run that clock.

At this point in the game it's a pretty marginal difference though. They stop the clock for about 5 seconds to spot it and then run it. It's under 5 minutes then they stop it. 

Posted
1 minute ago, adambr2 said:

Wicks has had hands of butter the last 2 games. 

The entire group has had too many drops so far this year

Posted

At least if you weren't going to score, none of that yardage lost really mattered anyway. Would have been worse to see Narveson shank a 50 yarder than punt it down to the 8.

Posted

Wouldn't be a Packer defense if they didn't go into a soft shell, leave the middle of the field wide open and let the other team just go down the field easily. 

Posted

I'm absolutely disgusted with you, Hafley. I thought you were different. Same late game conservative trash that doesn't work that we've seen for years. 

Posted
Just now, adambr2 said:

I'm absolutely disgusted with you, Hafley. I thought you were different. Same late game conservative trash that doesn't work that we've seen for years. 

I don't think he blitzes any more than Barry did. I was told this would be a more aggressive defense.

Brewer Fanatic Contributor
Posted

statistically might be better for Rams to not get that conversion

"Dustin Pedroia doesn't have the strength or bat speed to hit major-league pitching consistently, and he has no power......He probably has a future as a backup infielder if he can stop rolling over to third base and shortstop." Keith Law, 2006
Posted
1 minute ago, adambr2 said:

92 yards in 2-3 minutes? Using no timeouts? Absolutely inexcusable. 

I was almost hoping they'd make the two-point conversion so then if they get the ball back we won't lose in regulation we would get to overtime more than likely

Posted
4 minutes ago, yourout said:

I was almost hoping they'd make the two-point conversion so then if they get the ball back we won't lose in regulation we would get to overtime more than likely

Ehhh, I don’t know if they would play it that conservative and in theory they could have got it back with 3+ minutes still.

Posted
Just now, MrTPlush said:

We just snapped the ball with over 10 seconds left on the play clock.

Heck they may wish they had more time on the clock by the end of this drive. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Brewer Fanatic Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Brewers community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of Brewer Fanatic.

×
×
  • Create New...