1) Escobar outperformed Hardy in 2009, there should be no debate over this. He may have, but what was the point? The team was already tanking, and hopelessly out of it, so why burn service time for this 'phenom'? He hit .300, but was nothing special. 2) Escobar already has a WAR over 1 by every measure, baseball-ref WAR has him at 1.6. Simple math puts him at 2 to 2.5 WAR for a full season, a WAR of 2 is exactly the definition of average unless something has changed in the last couple of years. I've argued in the past that 'WAR' overvalues shortstops and center fielders. Escobar has been largely a black hole at the plate, and has barely outperformed Yuni at this point with less power and almost as many errors at shortstop. 3) Escobar has been hot for over month and has pushed every slash in his line up 40 points or so and is still ascending early in July, he's not anywhere near as bad as you paint him to be. You may not like him, but he's not garbage, he's still young, and still very talented. I'm sorry his learning curve has not met your expectations, but I would qualify your hatred of him as "absurd". The reason for my 'hatred' of Escobar was that he was brutal in pretty much every aspect of the game last year. How many games did he cost the team with crucial errors or mistakes on the basepaths, not even mentioning his anemic bat? He's not that young either, this is his 24 year old season. Hardy was an all star at that point with roughly the same or less MLB experience. 4) Yes a certain percentage of prospects will fail, pitchers failing more often than hitters, which is why you need more of them, not less of them. Once again using the idea that prospects are prone to fail doesn't prove that veteran players will provide better value. How many hits has Melvin had in free agency? Furthermore every single established MLB player was once a prospect, and I've been around long enough that I remember people who wanted to trade Braun, Weeks, Fielder, and Gallardo for established MLB talent. How would those deals have looked with the benefit of historical perspective? The simple truth is that a yearly influx of cheap/cost controlled talent is the only way to keep the Brewers competitive year in and year out. Prospects are the Brewer's lifeline, in the same way that they are the Packer's lifeline. Many of you have the logic completely backwards, wanting to avoid prospects all together, when the evidence from every angle actually suggests we need more of them. I would have thought that more people would have had their eyes opened to this concept given what happened with the super bowl champs, but I was mistaken, because it's mostly the same "buy, buy, buy" banter around this site. Not much to say here, but I'd rather have people complaining about a former Cy Young striking out over 11.5 per 9 than watching guys like Braden Looper, Doug Davis and Mike Burns starting games. But hey, with some guys pitching lights out in the Southern League. i 5) Defensively with McGehee at 3B we needed a SS with Escobar's range in the same way that having Weeks helps lessen the impact of Fielder at 1B. It's never as simple as a player for player swap, there are always larger team and organizational issues to consider, which in my opinion tend to get overlooked unless the issues become completely obvious watching the games, and even then people will still argue in favor of players like Betancourt and McGehee for fear of the unknown. I'd guess that shortstops who make 'rangy' plays to their right are mostly turning singles into infield hits. That will save you a few runs here and there but like I said, Escobar was largely an automatic out last season. By looking at the stats, he has a much higher rate of assists per game than Yuni, so no doubt he is getting to more balls. That has to be tempered mostly by the fact that Brewer pitchers are letting fewer balls hit into play. They have about 150 more strikeouts as a staff than K.C. 6) Sure it would be nice to have Hardy in 2011... but did you want him as the every day SS in 2009 when Escobar outplayed him? What about in 2010 when he only played in 101 games and went .320/.394/.714 while not doing anything until July, slumping again in August, only to finish strong in Sept while earning $5.1 mil? Agreed in hindsight keeping Hardy was the move. Interesting enough, Hardy outperformed both Escobar and Yuni in OPS during his 'horrible' 2009 which supposedly was bad enough to demote him to Nashville. Last year he was hurt a good chunk of the season, but still nearly outdid Escobar in extra base hits, runs and RBI with Escobar playing nearly every game. I agree that it was Busch league to send Hardy down for the minimum amount of time required to get another year of service out of him. It wasn't JJ's fault the organization called him up immediately following his shoulder surgery and it certainly wasn't his fault he suffered that horrible ankle injury. Agreed.