If I had to put money on it he stays in GB. I think he sees the legacy value of staying with the same team as well as the not-so-fairytale ending to a career Favre had. No doubt GB, after saying they want to be more transparent with Rodgers, has laid it on the line as far as who would likely be gone if they were to bring him and Adams back, although I'm sure you could still call that a SB-caliber team. Maybe Green Bay has added a "just not to an NFC team" to their agreement to trade Rodgers if he so wishes. And I have a hard time believing that Rodgers would have any qualms about playing in the AFC due to their level of competition. I'd imagine an athlete at his level would only look at that as being fun competition or simply that he's better than them and it would be no problem. I think I've reached a point where I don't much care either way. It would be fun to have another couple of seasons of being the best regular-season team in the NFC. But the video gamer in me also knows it's fun to blow everything up and see what happens. And if the Packers have bigger eyes toward another 15 years of dominance more than two more seasons of going for it, than Rodgers leaving would at least give the best chance of doing that considering we'd have a heck of a roster with just the one big question mark. The Green Bay administration isn't totally powerless in this, either. If they genuinely wanted to trade Rodgers (because of course they'll *say* they want Rodgers back) they could make that happen, too.