Oh jeez. What about baseball makes it anything like a regular business? You don't have to worry about competition (thanks antitrust exemption), you are guaranteed revenue streams from national/local TV deals as well as profit sharing before factoring in ticket sales, concessions, etc., and even if only 10,000 fans show up per game you apparently can still turn around and sell your business for over $1 billion. I agree with you in one sense that if owners just want fans to look at baseball teams like any other private company then they should just be upfront with fans and say they are going to field a team of minimum salary guys. That would make the most sense "financial management"-wise, right? Reduce labor and overhead costs to increase profits? That seems to be the strategy of the Pirates ownership. Weird how none of the "smart" baseball fans talk about what a good job the Pirates owners are doing at maximizing profit margins. It's almost like sports exist as a quasi-public trust and teams owe the fans a certain level of looking beyond the bottom dollar. Especially teams like the Brewers that have benefitted from public investment in the very field they play on. I don't think it's unreasonable that fans hope their favorite team manages its budget closer to that of a non-profit than a purely private corporation. Personally, I'm not arguing Mark A sign every FA possible and he has certainly invested more in the team than Selig did in the last 20 years of ownership. There are of course bad deals and some players make more money than their production on the field warrants. All I was seconding was the fact that owners have the capability to sign whatever players they want, but choose not to for one reason or another. It shouldn't be surprising that a team like the Padres made this deal with Tatis, Jr.. I hope we have a young player of his caliber we can make the same commitment to soon. I always remember how pumped I was when Braun signed his first extension.