I'm not of the opinion that the Brewers just have to spend money on Free Agents willy nilly, but it gets absurd when teams decide players are starting to get "expensive" so they look to trade them away as soon as they have to actually pay the players what they are worth (so I'm talking more about situations like Hader) in arbitration. Look at the Indians and Lindor. Given all the money floating around in baseball they absolutely can afford to pay Lindor and he should be the type of player the Indians hold on to for their fans. If he decides to leave for the Yankees, Dodgers, Red Sox of the world at the end of his contract so be it; but if a player of the caliber of Lindor shows himself to be a star, offer a fair extension with a buyout of his arbitration years and see if he sticks around. It's one of the reasons I was glad the Brewers decided to hold onto Fielder until the end. Following the Brewers as a kid in the mid-to-late 90's I never had a chance to have a guy I followed for his whole career like Yount. It wasn't until Braun came along, and having him sign his long term deal, that I finally had that type of player on my team. Sure it can be argued he is "overpaid" now, but given the value he gave the team from like 2007-2013 I think it's been worth every penny. And I don't really think his contract is some albatross on the team; they've had no problem signing players like Cain and Grandal while supporting $20+ million for Braun. As has been written on this board time and time again, the owners' first priority for owning the team is to make money, unlike us fans who want championships. We can be realistic and understand that the owners will not run the team like a non-profit. But I think it is also fair to question owners crying poor. If the Brewers/baseball as a whole were losing money, the owners would be trying to sell. Instead, money is more or less guaranteed year in a year out (it is a legal monopoly after all) so it seems like the argument is really only about the level of money that has to go to labor vs. the owner's pockets. Unless you saddled your team up with debt like the McCourts in LA, owning a team is as much of a guaranteed return on your investment as you can get.