So if they have better pitching and hitting, they'll be a better team? Hard to argue against that! Look, I can't say you're wrong, and you have a right to your optimism. I just don't agree. Remember, with Jeffress and Smith gone, it will be difficult (at best) for the bullpen to be as good as it was this season. Rotation can certainly be better, but not good enough to compete for WC even if everything goes right. Finally, as proven in another thread having a LH power bat would be nice, but it's not as important as you think it is. For example, having a productive Santana and Brinson in the OF would make a world of difference compared to the Flores, Kirk, and half a horrible season of Broxton in the OF. See, they are all RH, but much better results. Even with Lucroy gone, I can see them putting up more runs in 2017. Mostly because of the pathetic output from the OF for most of this season, and the game of musical chairs at 3B for half a season. I have to agree. The Brewers will have a decent offense in 2017, one that can get better when Brinson comes up, and which adds Ryan Cordell on the bench as another supersub. The real task for 2017 is to evaluate the in-house options at starting pitchers, whether they are on the 40-man, or at AA/AAA this year. My assumption is that Garza and Guerra are sell-high options. Maybe they get more lottery tickets (in terms of low-A players who may or may not work out). Peralta may be someone to deal at the deadline (or over the off-season if the market is there). Nelson, Anderson, and Davies are 3/4/5 starters. It's time to throw Jungmann, Suter, Hader, Wang, Burgos, and Lopez into the mix and see what they have got. I figure we'll also see Ortiz and Woodruff around this time next year. Some will start, others may be in the bullpen, but 2017 is the year to see who does what.