The "actual value of a player to his team" is the worst part of the rules because it creates the worst interpretations of what "most valuable" means. It creates confusion. On the one hand, people will say a guy is more "valuable" than someone else if his team makes the playoffs because, after all, without him, they wouldn't make it. On the other hand, it makes some people believe that a guy on, say, good team with 88 wins is more valuable than a powerhouse team with 102 wins because, heck, the powerhouse team would've still been good without the player. Relative value to a team should not be considered. Each player should be looked at simply for what he did that season, regardless of team.