Are baseball fans being naive about steroids? Why do we fans simply overlook other eras where it appears that illegal substance was used to increase player performance?[ There is a naiveness as to when steroids became popular through out professional sports. In 1954, the Soviets dominated the World Weightlfiting Championships. Their team physician admitted to administering steroids to the team. By 1972 there were full-scale drug-testing in the Olympics but it wasn't until the late 1980's/early 1990's that testing became reliable. We all know that the NFL players were taking steroids in the 70's like it was candy. So why couldn't steroid have crossed from sport to sport? Well it did. Tom House, who pitched from 1971 to 1978, admitted to using steroids. As a matter of fact his comment about it is ""I actually think that the game is cleaner today than when I was playing.'' ..."Every generation of players -- the '20s, '30s, '40s on up -- everybody was looking for a way to get the most out of their bodies, and they took whatever they possibly could. It was almost expected. . . " There was a greater number of players to join the 500 home run club in the 60's and 70's then today. Could it be that increased reliability in steroid testing in the late 80's has creating a false general assumption that the - 90's to present - is the steroid era? In addiiton, Look at the top career homeruns hitters: Hank Aaron had his best HR season at age 37. Barry Bonds had his best HR season at age 36. Babe Ruth had his best HR season at age 32. Willie Mays had his best HR season at 34. It doesn't appear that Bonds surge in power is out of the norm with other greats. Any thoughts?????