He was arguing that he's shown no indication that he can have an OBP over .400. Showing a stretch when he DID have an OBP over .400 is definitely showing "some indication". My indication was that he will not break-out (2008), not that he will not reach a .400 OBP (which I doubt he will anyway). I fully agree he was hotter than hot last Aug and Sept, and you can argue it was as hot as he's ever been in the major leagues. However, that was 197 PA, which is about 15% of his career PA. The argument can be made that he played hurt for two seasons, and part of that comes into play. I can also make the argument that many players have operated hurt for long periods of time and were able to muster up something better than his first 309 PAs last year (.212 .330 .363). Maybe he will just be consistently inconsistent, but overall the career numbers are not good and need a boost from a "break-out" year. And now, we wouldn't have to use any small sample alert. He didn't say that he's "only" done it in a small sample, he said he's never shown ANY indication....meaning a second half of .400 OBP would be a pretty clear indication. Small samples are pretty much implied around this site, at least that has been my experience. Running off stats for a month and a half of production is a relatively small sample. Don't use the small sample card only when its convenient for your argument. I claim that Weeks has not shown any indication of producing a break-out year (2008), not a break-out month and a half. And if the first half of spring is any indication... ah small sample (but a horrible one no less). I don't see how you can't be worried about Rickie's production this year with 0-5, 3K, 4LOB becoming the spring routine. His spring line is looking like an anti-ignitor (.121 .194 .242). Hopefully he's just working on plate discipline or mechanics http://forum.brewerfan.net/images/smilies/tongue.gif