I e-mailed him and pointed out the discrepancy between his "fact" about how the samples were stored and the collector's official statement. I doubt he replies as he probably isn't objective enough to see the difference. He's already entrenched himself on the side of Braun being a liar, a cheater and the beneficiary of a tiny loophole exploited by "brilliant lawyering". As far as the synth-T part of this, others have explained that the test for synth-T is very complex and demands a pristine sample. And it doesn't test for synth-T directly, just the signatures of some of the reactants. But when you've chemically altered your sample to the point where the T:E test misfires, I can't see how you would trust any test done downstream of that.