I don't agree with this at all. Clemente had a career line of .317/.359 /.475 with an OPS of .834 Henderson had a career line of .279/.404/.419 for an OPS of .820 I think Henderson had a much greater impact on the game, and his overall numbers took a big hit because he wanted to play so long. But the guy scored more runs, stole more bases than anyone and was the greatest leadoff hitter of all time. 6 times in the top 10 in MVP voting, 3 times in the top 3 including 1 MVP. Now take this into consideration. Clemente tragically died when he was 37 years old and started playing when he was 20 years old. Henderson started playing when he was 20 years old. If you just take Henderson's career through age 20, it looks like this' .287/.406/.435 OPS of .842 with 244 HR's and 1186 SB's. So the exact same OPS, a couple more HR's, about 1140 more SB's(which I realize doesn't fall under the best "hitter," of all time, but I think it needs to be taken into consideration how often a walk was a double to Henderson). Given the choice to play for my team for their entire career, I'd take Henderson. Clemente wasn't really a power hitter and he was a #3 hitter while Henderson was a leadoff hitter who hit about 60 more HR's and from ages 20-37 were nearly identical players. You can disagree, but if the discussion is about hitting and hitting alone, no, Henderson doesn't belong in the same discussion with Clemente. When Henderson got on base, he was incredible. But stealing bases to get into scoring position has absolutely nothing at all to do with hitting ability. Henderson was a good hitter, and had a spectacular impact on the game when he did get on. Clemente was an incredible hitter. And if we're going to look beyond hitting, I'll still take Clemente, the best defensive right fielder to ever play the game. Henderson created a lot of runs with his legs. How many runs did Clemente save the Pirates with his range, and his arm?