It's more about looking at past rebuilds/teardowns, and seeing how long it usually takes for a team to become competitive again. Brewers started their teardown at the deadline in 2015, and started playing .500 ball around the deadline in 2016 and winning baseball in 2017. That's a lot earlier than you normally expect to see results. It depends on how it happens. If the WC game comes about with like the second or third best record in the NL, then yeah that's a success sadly spoiled by the randomness of a 1-game winner takes all format. Missing the playoffs this year to me says nothing about on schedule or not. The team is competitive, but with some major holes still. Everyone is under team control for 2019, and most beyond that. Depends on who you mean by "anybody". Stearns is not getting fired regardless of playoff in 2018 or 2019. Counsell is unlikely to, and if it happens I'd argue it's more a case of having found someone even better, than as a result of having performed poorly enough to be sacked. Impossible from the outside to really judge a hitting coach and what impact he really has, positive or negative. Probably the most likely spot on the coaching team to see change though. For CC; see above. Yeah, not gonna bother with that. The phrasing and tone of the questions doesn't really imply trying to really understand, they sound like someone who has made up his mind and is trying to argue for why the team isn't on schedule. I don't recognize the above at all. It's not about just looking at the current record, but about the state of the organization. For instance, the Royals 80-82 in 2017 was a disaster and definitely not on schedule; they had a team filled with impending free agents (Cain, Hosmer, Moustakas, Escobar) and a poor farm system. It was their last chance to win anything for many years. The Rays finished with the same 80-82 record, but without the FA situation, without any awful big contracts holding them back, with a ton of young pitching talent etc. One team had a bright future, one didn't. So going back to the Brewers: The team is 3 years removed from the start of the rebuild, less than 2 years removed from finishing the teardown (Thornburg trade). The team has held the NL best record for large parts of the season, and are currently in a playoff spot and still have a shot at winning the division. This is with no impending free agents this year other than Kratz, Miley and potentially Moustakas (Mutual option) so everyone is coming back for 2019. Then for 2020, only Chacin and Jennings among the 2018 contributors aren't coming back. Plenty of players who recently made it to MLB (Hader, Burnes, Peralta, Woodruff) or look likely to do so soon (Dubon, Nottingham, Ray, Hiura etc). Noone can predict the future, but MLB baseball is largely a cyclical affair, and everything points to the Brewers still being on the upswing of that. 13 games over .500 in mid-August, would be in the playoffs if the season ended today, and more likely to improve than regress going forward? Yeah, I'll say we're on schedule. Well 13 games over .500 is good. But when you consider they have played under .500 ball for the last 65 games or so...its not that great. My worry is about all the players on this team who have regressed from last year or from the first half. Usually once you start to regress, it happens faster and faster, what will some of these players look like next year, if we have them. We will have to add additional players, to "be on schedule" and I'm not talking about just from the farm. My tone, if you can call it that..since you are basing it on written words, is base off of the past futility. Can you blame me? I would love to be a optimistic brewers fan. I am just worried about having to rebuild the rebuild. I love our owner, I'm not as high on Stearns as some. I like some if the moves, but they have to transition into sucess can't just have nice personal seasons. Oh and CC, well I think he is about as good a manager as he was a power hitter, Take that for what it's worth. Interesting reply, thanks