Very true. My apologies for the snarkiness. Here's a more thought out reply: I would probably put Pittsburgh ahead of us, but not by a lot. Replacing two decent starters is tough. Burnett helps, but they are thin there. They have some nice minor leaguers that could help out at some point next year, but that's a crapshoot. Bullpen has some excellent guy as well. I like their lineup better than ours, even without Martin. I'd actually place that Reds are as good or better than Milwaukee for 2015. Reds pitching had a better ERA than us last year, even though they lost Latos for 1/2 the season and Homer Bailey for 1/3 of the season. Both should be healthy in 2015. Offensively, they went from 698 runs in 2013 to 595 in 2014. Milwaukee had 650 last year. However, Cincy (as noted) had a ton of injuries. Votto missed 100 games. Mesoraco missed a month. Brandon Phillips missed 1/4 of the season. Jay Bruce hit poorly (.217 BA and 18 HR) after averaging 32 HRs from 2011-13. At 28, he has a good chance to rebound. Zack Cozart was awful hitting last year as well, but could rebound in 2015. I could easily see them equaling the Brewers offense. However, bloated payroll and impending free agency may very well cause some problems. Not to mention so many guys coming back from injury. You just never know who effective guys are going to be. What you may see as 'diminishing' a Brewer prospect may simply be someone assigning what they see as a realistic expectation on a player. I think the minor league forum is great - people offer lots of amazing insight and thoughts on our young players. People are excited about our prospects - even if they know they may be limited. I rarely see anyone diminishing every Brewer prospect and claiming other teams players are flawless. That many people express that we have a weak minor league system should not be a reason to attack them. Nor should the fact that someone may express admiration for another team's players. Yes, young talent is a crapshoot. That's why you should accumulate as much as possible. Top pitching prospects fail more than they succeed. For every Wily Peralta there's a Mark Rogers and a Will Inman. Excellent point. Cincy went from third in the league in runs scored to third worst in the NL in one year. The lost Choo to free agency, but suffered a lot of injuries (as noted above). Injuries can decimate a team (Rangers are another example). Quality depth can help alleviate some of the concerns about injuries. I like having Parra, for example, as our 4th OF, especially with Braunie's hand issues. Personally, I think people should be free to assign honest and realistic expectations about the team. Obviously, some people are more optimistic than others. As there is a middle, there are the extremes, and calling people's arguments on one side or the other mind-numbing and tiresome does not promote quality dialogue. I don't think a single person on this board believes the team is hopeless. We won 82 games last year. Can they get 8-10 more wins? Sure. Braun and Segura rebounds. Fiers for a full year. Avoid injuries. All that could happen. And we'd love every minute of it if it happened. Some people will be more skeptical about our chances than others. But to imply those people don't we have a chance is incorrect. Finally, Scherzer is a poor idea because we give up our top pick, and most importantly, I think the money can be used more efficiently and effectively. Milwaukee needs to be nimble as an organization. Tying us to one player for $25M (or more) for the next 6-8 years is a massive anchor.