I'm not talking about Melvin in particular. I think he's done a fine job and I'm gald he's in Milwaukee. In the bigger picture though, a team will pick a player high in a draft. Then the player is faulted for not living up to others' expectations, which are assumed to be fair, accurate and reasonable. Isn't it just possible that sometimes the front offices, not the players, are the ones who get it wrong? And, when they do, why are they not subjected to derisive labels like "bust"? I'd like just once to see a headline reading "Dragons GM A Bust", with a quote from a source in the organization that says, "We've followed this guy from high school through college. He did a great job lining up hotels for us with Visalia, but really came into his own in the video room in Pawtucket. We really liked his numbers, intangibles, and grasp of the BABIP stat, but for whatever reason, he never reached his potential. He's just not as smart as everyone thought he was. For the good of the organization we had to let him go."