Brewers Video
The Milwaukee Brewers will always have a decent amount of turnover. General manager Matt Arnold is not shy about wheeling and dealing. Trading Rhys Hoskins is a plausible option, though any deal hinges on other teams' interest, which often depends on cost and potential return.
Let's examine the potential results of looking for (and finding) a new home for Hoskins.
PROS
Frees Up Payroll for Additional Moves
Most would argue Hoskins's performance didn't match his $12 million salary last season, and it's unlikely he lives up to the $18 million cost in 2025. Opening up additional payroll flexibility to acquire more depth and fill other holes might be worth more than the veteran first baseman.
Depending on who the Brewers would get in return, the club acquiring Hoskins might not be willing to take on his entire paycheck, or they would offload salary Milwaukee's way in exchange. But even if the relief was only in the $8-10 million range, no team in baseball is better at utilizing smaller funds so effectively. Additionally, Hoskins has a mutual option for 2026 worth $18 million, with a $4 million buyout guaranteed. Offloading him would save Milwaukee from a future commitment while freeing up more money.
Create Flexibility for First Base and DH
Keeping Hoskins restricts Milwaukee's options for utilizing talent between first base and DH. He is limited as a defender, meaning the Brewers would likely prefer to add a better glove to play that spot half the time (at least). Thus, it confines the DH role somewhat, where that additional first base option eats up a roster spot instead of a "bat-first" stud to be the primary DH.
With first base a free position and the DH not needed for Hoskins or a backup first baseman exclusively, it opens up offensive possibilities. Free agent hitters like Joc Pederson and J.D. Martinez now become options, with their 132 and 122 OPS+es, respectively, across the past two seasons. Then the Brewers could focus on an everyday first baseman at a lower cost than Hoskins. For example, an NL Central veteran like Paul Goldschmidt suddenly becomes a solid fit for one season.
Value in the Players Milwaukee Gets Back
The Brewers likely wouldn't get much immediate value in return, unless they sent along cash or took back a bunch of salary. However, Milwaukee is adept at identifying guys they like based on skill, ceiling or other intangibles, particularly players they can develop over time. This is part of the reason the Brewers have consistently fielded postseason rosters since 2018.
They could also acquire a talented but struggling arm for the bullpen or rotation, believing they have the special sauce to unlock him for 2025 success. Or perhaps it's more depth for the position player group to ensure they're covered for injury or additional personnel moves. No matter the result, most would be confident the Brewers get legitimate value in return.
CONS
Brewers Could Miss Out on a Big Bounceback Season
It's important to acknowledge that Hoskins was returning from an ACL tear and surgery, seeing his first game action in over a year in 2024. It is unrealistic to expect an athlete to play at the top level of his sport when coming back from a major injury - especially at 31 years old. Whether it's strength, flexibility or endurance, the initial season is tough, and it was easily Hoskins's worst year by OPS+ (98).
Though it's far from a guarantee, many athletes come back stronger in season two. It would not be difficult to see Hoskins get closer to his career averages (.238/.346/.481) in 2025 versus his disappointing 2024 line (.214/.303/.419). Hoskins showed flashes last season with a .476 SLG and .813 OPS through May 13 before he got hurt. Upon his return, until the end of the season, he slugged only .396 with a .683 OPS. Still, his career norms could create a FOMO conversation for the Brewers in 2025.
Who Would Be Able to Fill the First Base Hole and Power Bat Role?
While trading Hoskins opens up creative opportunities for first base, it also could create another hole that could be tough to fill. It might also hurt the Brewers' need for a power bat, as Hoskins blasted 26 home runs despite his struggles. It would come down to timing and opportunity, and both factors have plenty of variables.
One issue is that for the Brewers to get the best value in trading Hoskins, they would be best served to see who misses out on the two biggest free-agent first basemen: Pete Alonso and Christian Walker. If those two take a while to sign, other options might also be taken off the board and Milwaukee could be left empty-handed (assuming they aren't in play for Alonso and Walker). If a Hoskins trade means relying on Tyler Black and other high-risk players, the Brewers could cause more harm than good. The Brewers have been 25th in fWAR from the first base position since 2022 and were 24th with a -0.4 fWAR in 2024, with Hoskins and Jake Bauers getting nearly all the at-bats there. While Bauers had the huge playoff home run, his last 100 plate appearances told a greater story.
Negative Impact on Free Agent Opinions of the Brewers
MLB is a business and players are as aware as the front office that the bottom line matters. However, relationships, culture and the treatment of others still play a role in building and creating winning organizations. Would trading Hoskins this offseason, after signing him to this type of deal, hurt the Brewers' reputation in how they acquire and move future players?
The Brewers would be doing nothing wrong by trading Hoskins. The player option existed, Hoskins took it and Milwaukee owns his contractual rights. But some might see a trade after just one season as a "bad faith" move in this case. Hoskins wasn't an elite-level free agent who did Milwaukee a favor, but it was a significant signing with a recognizable name. Could it cause future free agents to need more guarantees from the Brewers so they aren't worried about playing in a new city so quickly after signing in Milwaukee? Something to consider, at least.
No doubt Arnold and his staff go through a variety of reasons to make (or not) make deals. The current Brewers' roster and Hoskins "unknown" value compared to his salary make a trade less clean-cut than others in the past. What would you say are the odds the Brewers could find a suitor - and an offer - to ship Hoskins elsewhere this offseason?
Follow Brewer Fanatic For Milwaukee Brewers News & Analysis
-
1







Recommended Comments
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now