Jump to content
Brewer Fanatic
  • Brewers News & Analysis

    Pros and Cons of the Milwaukee Brewers Trading Rhys Hoskins


    Tim Muma

    Rhys Hoskins brought some value to the Milwaukee Brewers in 2024, but overall, he was an underwhelming addition with a heavy price tag. After Hoskins exercised his $18 million player option for 2025, the team lost a chunk of payroll flexibility—for now.

    Image courtesy of © Charles LeClaire-Imagn Images

    Brewers Video

    The Milwaukee Brewers will always have a decent amount of turnover. General manager Matt Arnold is not shy about wheeling and dealing. Trading Rhys Hoskins is a plausible option, though any deal hinges on other teams' interest, which often depends on cost and potential return.

    Let's examine the potential results of looking for (and finding) a new home for Hoskins.

    PROS
    Frees Up Payroll for Additional Moves
    Most would argue Hoskins's performance didn't match his $12 million salary last season, and it's unlikely he lives up to the $18 million cost in 2025. Opening up additional payroll flexibility to acquire more depth and fill other holes might be worth more than the veteran first baseman.

    Depending on who the Brewers would get in return, the club acquiring Hoskins might not be willing to take on his entire paycheck, or they would offload salary Milwaukee's way in exchange. But even if the relief was only in the $8-10 million range, no team in baseball is better at utilizing smaller funds so effectively. Additionally, Hoskins has a mutual option for 2026 worth $18 million, with a $4 million buyout guaranteed. Offloading him would save Milwaukee from a future commitment while freeing up more money.

    Create Flexibility for First Base and DH
    Keeping Hoskins restricts Milwaukee's options for utilizing talent between first base and DH. He is limited as a defender, meaning the Brewers would likely prefer to add a better glove to play that spot half the time (at least). Thus, it confines the DH role somewhat, where that additional first base option eats up a roster spot instead of a "bat-first" stud to be the primary DH.

    With first base a free position and the DH not needed for Hoskins or a backup first baseman exclusively, it opens up offensive possibilities. Free agent hitters like Joc Pederson and J.D. Martinez now become options, with their 132 and 122 OPS+es, respectively, across the past two seasons. Then the Brewers could focus on an everyday first baseman at a lower cost than Hoskins. For example, an NL Central veteran like Paul Goldschmidt suddenly becomes a solid fit for one season.


    Screenshot 2024-11-26 at 8.31.17 PM.png

    Value in the Players Milwaukee Gets Back
    The Brewers likely wouldn't get much immediate value in return, unless they sent along cash or took back a bunch of salary. However, Milwaukee is adept at identifying guys they like based on skill, ceiling or other intangibles, particularly players they can develop over time. This is part of the reason the Brewers have consistently fielded postseason rosters since 2018.

    They could also acquire a talented but struggling arm for the bullpen or rotation, believing they have the special sauce to unlock him for 2025 success. Or perhaps it's more depth for the position player group to ensure they're covered for injury or additional personnel moves. No matter the result, most would be confident the Brewers get legitimate value in return.

    CONS
    Brewers Could Miss Out on a Big Bounceback Season
    It's important to acknowledge that Hoskins was returning from an ACL tear and surgery, seeing his first game action in over a year in 2024. It is unrealistic to expect an athlete to play at the top level of his sport when coming back from a major injury - especially at 31 years old. Whether it's strength, flexibility or endurance, the initial season is tough, and it was easily Hoskins's worst year by OPS+ (98).

    Though it's far from a guarantee, many athletes come back stronger in season two. It would not be difficult to see Hoskins get closer to his career averages (.238/.346/.481) in 2025 versus his disappointing 2024 line (.214/.303/.419). Hoskins showed flashes last season with a .476 SLG and .813 OPS through May 13 before he got hurt. Upon his return, until the end of the season, he slugged only .396 with a .683 OPS. Still, his career norms could create a FOMO conversation for the Brewers in 2025.

    Who Would Be Able to Fill the First Base Hole and Power Bat Role?
    While trading Hoskins opens up creative opportunities for first base, it also could create another hole that could be tough to fill. It might also hurt the Brewers' need for a power bat, as Hoskins blasted 26 home runs despite his struggles. It would come down to timing and opportunity, and both factors have plenty of variables.

    One issue is that for the Brewers to get the best value in trading Hoskins, they would be best served to see who misses out on the two biggest free-agent first basemen: Pete Alonso and Christian Walker. If those two take a while to sign, other options might also be taken off the board and Milwaukee could be left empty-handed (assuming they aren't in play for Alonso and Walker). If a Hoskins trade means relying on Tyler Black and other high-risk players, the Brewers could cause more harm than good. The Brewers have been 25th in fWAR from the first base position since 2022 and were 24th with a -0.4 fWAR in 2024, with Hoskins and Jake Bauers getting nearly all the at-bats there. While Bauers had the huge playoff home run, his last 100 plate appearances told a greater story.


    Screenshot 2024-11-26 at 8.50.46 PM.png

    Negative Impact on Free Agent Opinions of the Brewers
    MLB is a business and players are as aware as the front office that the bottom line matters. However, relationships, culture and the treatment of others still play a role in building and creating winning organizations. Would trading Hoskins this offseason, after signing him to this type of deal, hurt the Brewers' reputation in how they acquire and move future players?

    The Brewers would be doing nothing wrong by trading Hoskins. The player option existed, Hoskins took it and Milwaukee owns his contractual rights. But some might see a trade after just one season as a "bad faith" move in this case. Hoskins wasn't an elite-level free agent who did Milwaukee a favor, but it was a significant signing with a recognizable name. Could it cause future free agents to need more guarantees from the Brewers so they aren't worried about playing in a new city so quickly after signing in Milwaukee? Something to consider, at least.

    No doubt Arnold and his staff go through a variety of reasons to make (or not) make deals. The current Brewers' roster and Hoskins "unknown" value compared to his salary make a trade less clean-cut than others in the past. What would you say are the odds the Brewers could find a suitor - and an offer - to ship Hoskins elsewhere this offseason?

    Follow Brewer Fanatic For Milwaukee Brewers News & Analysis

    • Like 1

    Recent Brewers Articles

    Recent Brewers Videos

    Brewers Top Prospects

    Brandon Sproat

    Milwaukee Brewers - MLB, RHP
    Sproat had a rough first appearance in a Brewers uniform (3 IP, 7 ER, 3 HR). On Thursday, he gave up one run on 4 hits and a walk over 6 2/3 innings. He struck out six Blue Jays batters.

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Featured Comments

    I've written this before but I think the problem is that that Rhys has good value as a DH, he was worth 0.2 offensive WAR (between 1.9-3.4 every other year, not including 2020). Since we have Yeli and Contreras who will likely need a vast majority of the DH time there isn't really a DH path for him.

    If he does break the bat out for us and has a 3 WAR offense season the glove and baserunning likely makes that a 2 WAR season. For a team like the Brewers 2 WAR for $18 million isn't a great deal but I think everyone would take it in a heartbeat basically picking up the Willy slack. However I feel like there could be lots of ways we could find a 2 WAR 1st baseman cheaper. I am pretty confident that if Tyler Black provided even Rhys quality defense he would be worth over 2 WAR just because of the baserunning factor addition.  

    The big question is how much would another team value him in a trade, coming of a poor season he is definitely going to have a negative value. My thought is that some DH/power needy team would put around a $8-12 million value on him, giving him a -6 to -10 million dollar value. Essentially saying we need to eat 6-10 million in a trade  or add addition players that reduce that value. Now we aren't a team that can really just eat 6-10 million but saving the 8-12 million might be worth it if we can spend the money elsewhere and replace the Hoskins value cheaper (Black/FA/trade).

    One of my favorite trades to get rid of Rhys is sending Rhys and Civale to the Mets (say the Mets miss out on the top 4-5 bats in the market) for basically nothing and then using the money to sign a short term pitcher and then getting a 1B back for Devin (N Lowe, Mountcastle, Horwitz (plus), etc.)

    • Like 2

    Good article Tim on the pros and cons of a Hoskins trade.  I'd be surprised is Arnold could get good enough offers to justify a trade, but Arnold has surprised me before.

    Arnold took control in November of 2020 and since that time the Brewers have missed the playoffs in only one year.  I happen to have the 2020 Brewers rooster in my computer files and took a look at the team.  Only one position player, Yelich, remains with the current team and only 3 pitchers, Woodruff, Peralta, and Williams are still on the rooster. That's a lot of wheeling and dealing and I might add, with great success.  I just thought your readers would be interested in that tidbit.

    • Like 1
    5 hours ago, jay87shot said:

    I've written this before but I think the problem is that that Rhys has good value as a DH, he was worth 0.2 offensive WAR (between 1.9-3.4 every other year, not including 2020). Since we have Yeli and Contreras who will likely need a vast majority of the DH time there isn't really a DH path for him.

    If he does break the bat out for us and has a 3 WAR offense season the glove and baserunning likely makes that a 2 WAR season. For a team like the Brewers 2 WAR for $18 million isn't a great deal but I think everyone would take it in a heartbeat basically picking up the Willy slack. However I feel like there could be lots of ways we could find a 2 WAR 1st baseman cheaper. I am pretty confident that if Tyler Black provided even Rhys quality defense he would be worth over 2 WAR just because of the baserunning factor addition.  

    The big question is how much would another team value him in a trade, coming of a poor season he is definitely going to have a negative value. My thought is that some DH/power needy team would put around a $8-12 million value on him, giving him a -6 to -10 million dollar value. Essentially saying we need to eat 6-10 million in a trade  or add addition players that reduce that value. Now we aren't a team that can really just eat 6-10 million but saving the 8-12 million might be worth it if we can spend the money elsewhere and replace the Hoskins value cheaper (Black/FA/trade).

    One of my favorite trades to get rid of Rhys is sending Rhys and Civale to the Mets (say the Mets miss out on the top 4-5 bats in the market) for basically nothing and then using the money to sign a short term pitcher and then getting a 1B back for Devin (N Lowe, Mountcastle, Horwitz (plus), etc.)

    Trading him off by sending a prospect package with him so we can sign Goldschmidt sounds like a good plan to me.

    Tim Muma
  • Brewer Fanatic Contributor
  • Posted

    12 hours ago, jay87shot said:

    I've written this before but I think the problem is that that Rhys has good value as a DH, he was worth 0.2 offensive WAR (between 1.9-3.4 every other year, not including 2020). Since we have Yeli and Contreras who will likely need a vast majority of the DH time there isn't really a DH path for him.

    If he does break the bat out for us and has a 3 WAR offense season the glove and baserunning likely makes that a 2 WAR season. For a team like the Brewers 2 WAR for $18 million isn't a great deal but I think everyone would take it in a heartbeat basically picking up the Willy slack. However I feel like there could be lots of ways we could find a 2 WAR 1st baseman cheaper. I am pretty confident that if Tyler Black provided even Rhys quality defense he would be worth over 2 WAR just because of the baserunning factor addition.  

    The big question is how much would another team value him in a trade, coming of a poor season he is definitely going to have a negative value. My thought is that some DH/power needy team would put around a $8-12 million value on him, giving him a -6 to -10 million dollar value. Essentially saying we need to eat 6-10 million in a trade  or add addition players that reduce that value. Now we aren't a team that can really just eat 6-10 million but saving the 8-12 million might be worth it if we can spend the money elsewhere and replace the Hoskins value cheaper (Black/FA/trade).

    One of my favorite trades to get rid of Rhys is sending Rhys and Civale to the Mets (say the Mets miss out on the top 4-5 bats in the market) for basically nothing and then using the money to sign a short term pitcher and then getting a 1B back for Devin (N Lowe, Mountcastle, Horwitz (plus), etc.)

     

    1) I am 100% down with finding a suitor for Civale. I would have been fine with non-tendering him, honestly, just to get that money back into the payroll

    2) I have always like Lowe. The last 2 seasons something has been different with him, so harder to guage his value. Though I will always love a .360 OBP guy.

     

    On 11/27/2024 at 9:58 AM, LakeshoreLarry said:

    Good article Tim on the pros and cons of a Hoskins trade.  I'd be surprised is Arnold could get good enough offers to justify a trade, but Arnold has surprised me before.

    Arnold took control in November of 2020 and since that time the Brewers have missed the playoffs in only one year.  I happen to have the 2020 Brewers rooster in my computer files and took a look at the team.  Only one position player, Yelich, remains with the current team and only 3 pitchers, Woodruff, Peralta, and Williams are still on the rooster. That's a lot of wheeling and dealing and I might add, with great success.  I just thought your readers would be interested in that tidbit.

    How about trading Rhys Hoskins for a next season 42 year old Justen Verlander? 

    There is no world where trading Hoskins is real or even optional.  I do not see how any team out there would do the Brewers this favor.   No team needs a Hoskins . Alonzo cannot even find a contract and he is miles better than Hoskins.   Right now 1st base if the Running back of baseball it seems and the position is so undervalued.    Somehow we went from 3rd and 1st being power hitters for a team to Shortstops and 2nd base being the position of stat hitters.   I think Short leads all baseball in WAR.   

    Is Hoskins worth 22 million for 2025?  Yes .  He is and his 2024 season numbers have 0 to do with anything.  The chances of Hoskins having a stand up season this year are very high.  Just like with Willy last season we are looking at a player who must play his best to garner another big contract after 2025.   So I expect Rhys will have a big season this year and with the loss of Adames the Brewers cannot afford to screw around and hope they find 55ish home runs without Hoskins and Adames in the order.       Hoskins ability to hit when the game is most on the line is worth keeping him on itself.    I hate that the Brewers did not get the Hoskins they really wanted to get when they signed him but they did get a leader who has a lot of Baseball in his head.   What he can teach the Turang, Sal and Chourio's of this roster is worth having him around as well.    Experienced stars develop inexperience and Rhys is that all day.  

    No way there is a team out there dumb enough to just bail out the Brewers on Rhys money just to help the Brewers which is the only reason anyone would ever  think about a Hoskins trade.   I just do not believe anyone is serious about this in truth.     

    Also this Mets Rumor would be EVIL. No player hated that franchise more than Hoskins and trading him to that place would be a jerk move.  

     

    At this point he is our guy and his 2025 should look at least better than his 2024.   I believe Hoskins is poised for a big 2025.   That alone is worth the money it costs to keep him.   Back when there was doubt about the TV deal and money was no longer a sure thing this unloading of Hoskins was worth the conversation.  Now though with the new TV deal signed and money is not so hard to come by this is not a contract that is hurting the Crew and it should not be a conversation had by anyone until the deadline at least.       Hoskins helps this team and we need him.   It is that simple. 



    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...