In defense of Roeincke there, guys like Morgan and Gomez have a decent chance at any time to turn a sac bunt into a hit given their speed, especially Morgan since he seems to be a pretty skilled bunter. When pretty much anyone else in the lineup puts a bunt down, it's only to advance the runner a base. If Morgan gets a quality bunt down there, he can not only move Weeks to second, he can end up with a hit. I don't really ever watch American League games, so i was expecting mass amounts of bunting from the way some of you guys here talk about the Angels. So far this year though, i haven't seen any excessive amounts of bunting and i don't count Morgan/Gomez the same as other players because of their fabulous speed. Strikes me as a very reasonable decision and with Gomez having such terrible on base skills, a bunt by him at least advances the runner and as i said before, if he gets the bunt in a good spot, it's gravy with a hit. Hart was sac bunting in the first inning in one of his first games back.To be fair, that was the game after the 1-0 loss at San Diego where the offense looked pathetic. Weeks led off with a double, and the Hart sac bunt was a "let's finally get a run, the lead, and some momentum." Would I have done the same thing? No, but with the offense looking as lifeless as it was at the time, I can see some justification behind it.