Fear The Chorizo

Well, they wouldn't wind up on the Dodgers then, would they? I also find it hard to believe that a Japanese player would turn down generational wealth from any organization in baseball due to "culture shock" in today's MLB just because they don't play half their games in a city on the west coast. The argument about not having enough chance to win has more to do with the system I'm advocating be changed, too. The player still would have a right to negotiate with any team eligible to sign them over that 45 day period - it isn't that difficult for even large market teams to get under the luxury tax threshold consistently enough, either. Maybe once over previous 5 years is too long a period for a team to be excluded from bidding on a posted Japanese/professional player....because using 2024-2020 seasons that list would be 14 teams. let's go with being over the luxury tax at least 3 of the previous 5 seasons....that same period would then only include the Yankees, Phillies, Braves, Dodgers, Astros, and Giants. Even with the massive spending the Mets and Yankees have recently committed to, I think the only MLB team that finds itself in perpetual luxury tax hell with existing contracts on the books is the Dodgers (meaning they'd need to gut their current roster to get under that threshold due to longterm contracts and deferrals). They are by far and away playing by a different set of rules than anyone else in MLB - which should be obvious considering the fact they can be penciled in as a WS participant for the NL at the start of every season, and nobody in their right mind would bet against that. That HAS to change somehow for the good of the league.

The Cards only needing 10+ yards in a 3-4 down scenario to ice the game against a leaky defense after a failed 4th down and roughly 30 yards + a game winning FG in a tie game are also two very different sets of circumstances, too. When your kicker just made one from 61 earlier in the game and the offense has had a propensity to dial up very strange playcalls on 4th and shorts...at the time I thought taking my chances kicking it for the points to tie made more sense than doing what they did. I'd assume the probabilities were about a coinflip in that moment as to which option gave the team less of a chance to lose...probably going for it gave the Packers a slightly better chance to win...just glad the Packers came out on top and not going to get overly worked up about it.

100% this. IF there isn't a legit salary cap and/or full revenue sharing across MLB as part of this next CBA, I think the bare minimum change that needs to happen is to set up some sort of guardrails on Asian professional league poaching for teams who exceed MLB's luxury tax at least once over the prior 5-year period. I'm sure there would be ways for the Dodgers and other big market bullies to game the system somehow (i.e., colluding with premier Japanese players and their Japanese teams to wait to post them until they're eligible to bid on them), but something needs to be done. Right now Japan is the equivalent of a Dodger AAA team on top of their own farm system that gets to draft and sign US/international amateur players at the same rate as everyone else. It's absurd.

With one timeout and the 2 minute warning left, opting to go for it down 3 in that spot gave the Packers 1 chance to win or tie the game, not 2....glad they made the play (even though I still think Kraft's catch could've been overturned with what I saw as a slight bobble as he was getting feet down). Had they not converted, the Cards would've needed 1 first down to ice the game (not 25-35 yards to try and win it with a long FG), and even if they didn't get that 1st down, you'd get the ball back with less than a minute left still down 3 and no timeouts deep in your own territory. Kick the FG to tie it there, then even if the 1st play the Cardinals make results in a 1st down, you can stop the clock twice more and wind up leaving yourself enough time for a last ditch drive to tie it up again assuming your defense doesn't force a 3 and out/gives up FG range. Miss the FG and you can still force a 3 and out/get the ball back with enough time to get another FG shot. I get the logic, but how the game was flowing I thought it was the wrong decision even though they converted. Glad to be wrong in that instance. I would've been more comfortable going for it if the Packers still had 3 timeouts - and would be really curious what they would've opted to do if the were in more of a 'gimme' FG range with similar time left on the clock.

Well, obviously - my point is that the Brewers should view this coming offseason from the lens of "how do we get the most talent on the field for 2026 to win a world series, knowing minor league prospects not yet on 40 man rosters may readily replace MLB players in 2028 over the next couple years if an extended strike happens? Looking at it that way, IMO, means Freddy goes nowhere and is a Brewer in 2026

Freddy will turn 30 in the middle of next season - at $8M for 2026 and what he can do on the mound, IMO the Brewers won't get anything close to equal value in trading him for prospects before opening day. I think he provides a great rotation anchor role and is absolutely worth keeping around for next year to build around with all the other young arms. I also wouldn't want to extend him and will be happy to pick up the draft compensation assuming he declines the QO and enters free agency next offseason (similar to Burnes)....assuming there is an offseason - wondering what an impending lockout means to any free agents and what sort of compensation package that looks like for a team losing a free agent. I think 2026 should be a "go for it" year in Milwaukee unlike any other, because who the hell knows what the financial landscape will look like past this next season. That's actually the main reason why I wouldn't trade Freddy, now that I think of it.

Even with converting - that was stupid

Ok, so I think this is stupid - dont convert here and you lose because of the earlier timeouts

Playing for the tie apparently?

What on earth are the plays being called right now? That series had zero chance

Instantly in FG range, lol

This is the most disjointed game ive seen in a very long time

Apparently McBride got omitted on the red zone scouting report - just wide open for both their TD passes

Seems like the delayed flight should've just waited longer to drag this insufferable unit to Phoenix yesterday...waste of jet fuel so far

Yeah, coaching is a huge problem So is jumping offsides - my goodness And leaving their best receiver wide flipping open in the red zone This is brutal

This defense lives on the field...its ok to make a stop on 3rd down, guys

Im reaching the point in knowing this team isnt very good

The whole bubble screen/swing pass screen portion of the playbook (which is apparently 2/3rds of it). Needs to be burned.

A hard cap and floor, full revenue sharing, and take 1 season out of the path of team control to reach free agency. Make it the NFL model but with guaranteed money. Honestly, i dont know why any team but the Dodgers wouldnt want that.

Dec 1, 2026 is when the lockout will start, about a month after the Dodgers 3rd straight WS parade. When it will end is anyone's guess - mine would be sometime before the 2029 regular season. Id want Miz, Patrick, Freddy, Gasser, and Priester in the rotation...although Henderson and Woodruff are definite possibilities, too.

Id say utility OF is his ceiling and always was - he overperformed that for awhile and then underperformed severely down the stretch - but a switch hitter with good plate discipline is valuable if there is more OF talent playing everyday in front of him.

Cruz sucks defensively and strikes out a ton - this team needs a quality all around SS and needs to be willing to trade the pieces necessary to make it happen. Gunnar Henderson, please. This team also needs a DH, and i know Yelich hamstrings them because of what he is still owed and the fact he isnt an everyday OF. Scwharber would look great in Milwaukee for the next 5-6 seasons - but a large market team will simply outbid anything the Brewers could offer. The Brewers need to use their system to acquire impact talent - they cant play the free agency game with large market teams to land impact veteran free agents, they will get outbid every time. I also think they need to continue pushing young impact prospects aggressively, based on how Chourio and Miz were the best players on their roster this postseason.

The issue is right now its the Dodgers, then an enormous gap, then the rest of mlb. Id put the Brewers firmly in the group of 5 teams who can say annually that they are the 2nd best team in baseball. But the gap between anyone and the Dodgers is a chasm. They wouldve done the same thing and probably worse to the Cubs, curb-stomped the Phillies (who at least won a game), and made the Reds look like a AA squad. That gap will continue, unfortunately

If Suarez replicated his "production" that he gave the Mariners after the trade deadline for the brewers in August/september here, he might have led them to a wildcard berth and not a division title. Taking what happened against 4 Dodgers aces and going back to see what who actually was dealt at the trade deadline that could have helped them score more is a fool's errand. Durbin was actually the Brewers best offensive player in the NLCS, and he plays Suarez's position

Isn't the lockout/pending multi year strike starting after the end of next season? Because I expect to miss at least 1 year of baseball - and honestly there should be enough owners to be fine missing multiple years if a salary cap is a nonstarter to the MLBPA.