Jump to content
Brewer Fanatic

dlk9s

Verified Member
  • Posts

    10,655
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

 Content Type 

Profiles

Forums

Blogs

Events

Milwaukee Brewers News, Rumors & Analysis

2026 Milwaukee Brewers Top Prospect Rankings

Milwaukee Brewers Videos

2022 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Milwaukee Brewers Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Milwaukee Brewers Fan Guides & Resources

2023 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2024 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

The Milwaukee Brewers Players Project

2025 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2026 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by dlk9s

  1. Thing is, the whole "Diaz established his path" is complete BS. You can see that Diaz never intended to run toward the base. He ran straight at Godley (or where Godley was going to end up) the entire time. It wasn't until he got to Godley that he made his sidestep. If he was trying to run to first base, he might have initially started on the grass, but then he would have angled himself toward the bag. He never did that. There is no possible way Godley interfered. He fielded the ball and that was that. There is no reasonable interpretation of interference on his part.
  2. You can see that Diaz was hunting the interference call as soon as he saw where the ball was headed. He purposely "established" his path on the grass, casually jogged toward Godley, and then made his little veer back to the right to make it look like Godley got in his way.
  3. Think the Padres board is pages full of people complaining that they never score with bases loaded and nobody out?
  4. My wife is from Rockland County, NY, which is just north of NYC and right on the New Jersey border. Lots of New Yorkers call it "upstate."
  5. I only played through high school, so obviously I can't speak to what it's like in the big leagues, but my attitude was that if the first pitch was a good one to hit, there was no reason to put myself in an 0-1 hole just for the sake of...something. Of course, that approach isn't going to work for someone who doesn't have a good eye at the plate.
  6. I read their names and assumed they were Yankees extras in Major League.
  7. I thought it looked really good and was very easy to read.
  8. I'm just happy that MLB Extra Innings games are finally in HD.
  9. Bally's might have paid out handsomely had anyone bet a parlay that the Twins would score their first run of the season on a wild pitch and the Brewers on bases loaded walk.
  10. The bottom line is that there will probably be some growing pains with an all-cashless system, both on the part of employees and fans. But once everyone gets used to it, things will be fine. I don't go to many games (don't live in Milwaukee, so I haven't specifically been to a Brewers game in a couple decades, probably), but I enjoy not needing cash. A decade ago, I wouldn't have liked being forced into using apps for tickets (credit cards for payments have always been great), but it's 2021 and smartphones/mobile internet are much more reliable and ubiquitous, so I think it will be fine. Now if you want to argue that the elimination of print-at-home tickets is unnecessarily restrictive for those who want to gift/share/sell their tickets, that's a different story.
  11. NEVER FORGET
  12. Nah, I don't opt to cheer for an athlete's decline, especially one who I enjoyed watching when he was in Milwaukee.
×
×
  • Create New...