The logic doesn't add up there. If there are actual numbers of significant sampling that state it does, I'd like to see that. I think that math is "logical" by definition. It's common sense that isn't adding up. The discrepancy is definitely befuddling, but it is what it is. sveumrules has offered up some numbers. I think that the most important thing is that you can't dismiss a Gorman Thomas or an Adam Dunn or a Russell Branyan simply because they strike out a lot. And you can't laud a Yuni B. because he doesn't. There's more that comes into the picture. José Hernandez was an interesting case. He was with the Brewers for three years. The year he struck out the most was his most productive at the plate (188 K, .356 OBP, .478 SLG, .834 OPS). The year he struck out the least was his least productive (125K, .315 OBP, .372 SLG, .687 OPS). When we talk about the Royals, we tend to zero in on their very low strikeout total, but that doesn't tell the whole story. They were still above the MLB average in both OBP and SLG. The low strikeout total is just a part of the story.