RickieWeeksJr, you keep moving the line of describing Weeks. First, you say he hasn't proved he belongs in the majors, than you say we can't be disappointed in him, than you say we can't call him solid. How about you choose which point you want to make, and than we can discuss it. Weeks has clearly proven he belongs in the majors. If your only arguments are that his batting average is low and that he has had fielding problems in the past, you don't have enough of an argument. Solid is such a nebulous description that it is probably meaningless when describing a baseball player. He will go through streaks where he is very valuable, and streaks where he struggles. You can say the same about the majority of baseball players, so that doesn't really get us anywhere. Disappointing is interesting in that it entirely depends on the expectations. Mickey Mantle was disappointing to Yankee fans. Expectations have nothing to do with actual value that Weeks brings. Weeks is clearly a valuable member of the Brewers and will be for at least a few more years. Beyond that, he could be a star, or he could be cut when his arbitration numbers get too high. For now, we should enjoy watching a fun ballplayer that is contributing to this year's success. I don't know if you look at anything besides BA, but Weeks has scored 19 runs in 21 games. You think someone who doesn't belong in the majors could do that? Another way to look at this is that Weeks has more runs than hits. Kind of puts BA in perspective, doesn't it?