"Are you referring to his .340 OBP and .354 SLG with Boston in 2006? Why is he obviously better than that?" One reason it is obvious is that he had the talent at to do so previously in his career. Kapler wasn't just bad his last few years, he was awful, below replacement level. I have a hard time believing that someone as terrible as he was for the last few years could be so successful, even in a small sample, without some kind of change. I would be curious to know what happened with Kapler. Maybe he was one of those muscle heads who tried to get as big as he could, and forgot that he needed agility as a baseball player. Maybe he discovered some relaxation technique that enables him to focus better. Or maybe it's just small sample size. I, personally, think it's fun to imagine what could be, rather than end all discussions with "sample size". That doesn't result in interesting discussion.