Obviously, I'd rather have had him hit the shot, there's many things I would have rather had happen in these last two games, but I felt like the logic here was well explained. In any event, this back and forth isn't productive anymore. Agree to disagree. If he makes it there is probably about a 40% chance the Bucks win in regulation, maybe higher?. Versus OT being essentially the best-case scenario once he missed. I'm not seeing what there is to disagree on there. Yes they still could have and arguably should have won after the miss, but him hitting that shot likely tips the scale more in their favor than any other point in that game. But yeah, the point was it's a very thin line when you get to this point in the year. A couple moments can dictate a sweep or a 2-2.