here's a possible reason for that. -There's more high schools than colleges. -without looking at numbers, I would estimate that half of all high school players that will eventually sign a pro deal (in their lives) probably do so upon graduating from high school (lets say in 2004). Without taking JuCo into account, that means that 3 years later there will be another strong high school crop, but the college kids (who graduated in 2004) will have already been picked through once. So--once again without crunching numbers--one could hypothesize that only 1/3 of the top talent comes from the college ranks, while the other 2/3rds comes from HS. Then assume that 1/2 of those HS players won't sign. But before that assumption, it's arguable that the HS players have better overall talent AND there are more of them. This leads me to argue that perhaps having a big draft budget, and drafting all high school kids should potentially lead to a stronger farm system than drafting all college kids. It will take longer for them to develop...that is true. In the end, I think a draft strategy that takes both college and high school players is best, however, I would most definitely endorse some sort of ratio similar to what the Brewers did this year, with about 2/3rds or more being from the HS and JuCo ranks. So, does this confuse anyone?