I try to. But when there are like a page and a half of "OMG Greinke sucks because I use antiquated numbers in absurdly small sample size" and then Weeks hits a rocket home run and there is one comment, it gets fairly annoying. So here is a simple question that can be answered with a simple yes or no should you so choose. Have you been happy with his performance thus far? Look I've read Baseball Between the Numbers and subscribe to the value of sabermetrics, but I am having a hard time believing this is the pitcher you thought we were getting. His performance or the results? I have never seen a pitcher with such a high percentage of mistakes get hit hardly, I have never seen a pitcher who has hits string together on him, and I have never seen a guy who has his mistakes hit with RISP like Greinke. People are so quick to point out that Greinke makes a bad pitch that gets hit, but forget that every mistake in baseball isn't hammered. Most mistake pitches are missed. If you told me he would be striking out more than a batter per inning and keeping the walk rate down, I'd tell you I'm happy. I just don't look at ERA over half a season. It's basically meaningless in terms of future performance. If you are mad about how he's done so far, I'd tell you that it doesn't really matter because he's gotten great run support.