But its due to the offense that we continue to lose, not the manager. That is probably true, but it is the manager's job to put the team in the best possible position to win. The Brewers hadn't put together a rally all game long and were down 2-0, but yet put the first two guys on in the 7th. I can see bunting the guys over down by one run in the 8th or 9th inning, but not in the 7th inning...especially with a full compliment of PH available on the bench. If Yost truly wanted to bunt the runners over so bad, why wasn't a better hitting pitcher (Obermueller, Capuano) put in there to do it? Sheets had already bunted into a DP earlier in the game, and has proven for many years now that he sucks as a hitter. He lets Sheets bunt, and then takes him out to pinch-run for him with Liefer. And then Yost says after the game that if Sheets had gotten the bunt down, he would have been back out for the 8th inning...after throwing 110 pitches through 7 frames. Its like he isn't even watching what is happening on the field. I have no problem "believing" in your players to get the job done. However, you can take it too an extreme so it becomes a fault (example: playing Brady Clark five days a week). I don't care if Ben takes bunt and batting practice every damn day...he has proven time in, time out during the games, when it really counts, that he can't handle the stick. With that being the case, there is no real reason he should have been hitting in that situation. Being a "hard worker" at something and having the right "attitude" only takes you so far. Sooner or later, you have to have results to show for it. I'm sick and tired of Ned Yost using work ethic and/or attitude as the #1 (and sometimes only) reason for some of the decisions he makes.