Man-O-Man, don't blow up on me or anything anyone, but as of now we only have one team above .500 and the rest are at or below it. Was our farm system a little overrated? Possibly, tho I don't think it is necessarily the case. Just like people shouldn't get overly excited about Milwaukee's start, they shouldn't get overly worried about the minors starts. There are a number of things that should be pointed out: 1) The more prospects you have, the fewer "old, not prospect yet good minor league" players you have. What was it, 2000, when Indy won the AAA WS? I don't know if they had a single prospect on their roster when they did. They had a bunch of guys like Liefer and Rushford and Ebert. I'd rather have this team, even if they finish the season .500, than that one. 2) The rosters are filled with players jumping from one level to another, with some of the players skipping an entire level. Most players are going to stuggle initially as they adjust to the next level of competition, new places to live, new teammates, etc, and some players will flame-out. As with last year, I'd be more inclinded to look at the second half of the season and see how the teams/players are doing. That gives the players some time to adjust. While we may not see Helena AND Beloit AND Huntsville win titles, I don't think it would be out of the question to see one of them win something. 3) Milwaukee might have the best minor league system, but that isn't based upon wins and losses. Its based upon the players in the system and how they'll contribute to Milwaukee's success down the road. 4) Huntsville only has 6 position players on their roster. They have no chance of winning. At this point I think it is too early to draw too many conclusions. With each passing day, tho, these concerns become a little harder to ignore. August 1 might be a good time to revist things.