under 35, loathe the DH the DH - quite frankly - is unAmerican: slothlike, one dimensional, elitist, static, non-democratic, predictable, reactive ooooh and what really burns my britches is Papi and others taking their at-bat and immediately retreating to the clubhouse to watch frame by frame video of the previous pitch's nuances, not to mention the prepped video of whatever reliever might be brought in to face him in end game later innings. Thereby effectively removing the real-time evolutionary art from the game in favor of scientific preparation. I am all for allowing technology into the game but not in such an un-balanced fashion. All this talk about "just another stick in the line-up" - though true - is just the tip of the iceberg. The psychological impact can be monumentally rewarding or devastatingly crushing. Zambrano socking a homer to put himself ahead 1 - 0 amps him up something special… hell, Zambrano with a low pitch count in a tie game coming up bottom 6 with a RISP gets to stay in the game - Sheets, maybe not. John Q. Southpaw flaring a duck fart to extend a rally demoralizes a defense, lifts the entire O-squad. More sections of this 7 layer dip include the need for a versatile bench, situational hitting (e.g. the importance of an 8 hole hitter - a COMPLETE nonfactor in AL play), fundamental station to station bunting / hit & run play, substitutional timing (is your long reliever burned up from the night before?), plus more. With no analysis to support the idea, I would guess statistics to show that NL games are closer - due to the absence of the aforementioned stick and the rarity of big innings where your line-up turns over. The NL is just so much richer textually. And if the Brewers pitchers could succeed in laying down a bunt (excluding Suppan) with a success rate over 20%, I posit we wouldn't care. We're just so frustrated by the lack of production (excluding Yo) and the precept of having 8 hitters in the line-up.