Just so I understand you correctly, are you saying that no matter what happens in the remaining 5 2/3 years of this contract with Priester, even if he fulfills the best case scenario of what the Brewers saw in him, that the Brewers will have given up too much? Or that it was an overpay based on knowing that Boston would have given him up for less if Arnold had negotiated better? My issue is making definitive statements about the calculus of this whole thing when one side of the equation hasn't even been filled in yet.
Don't misunderstand me, I don't think it was a great trade, I'd preferred they hadn't made it. I just balk at all the talk at this being some sort of clearly done deal.