Do you really think Witrado could put together a coherent paragraph?More than anything, what I find really interesting is how long management can engage in these types of arguments (or cliches as Rluz demonstrated) and expect the public to take them hook-line-and-sinker. I'm sure that we could find a number of different reasons as to why this is the case, but there's only one that really matters: it works. It's frustrating to me because it smacks of condescension but as long sound bytes are what rules the day, cheap answers will get endless play in newspapers and on the radio and on international cable sports networks. They're more than happy to take my money for the product, but as soon as questions are raised about how and why things occur, we're kept at a distance by mysterious things like "unwritten rules," "the book," "the right way to play the game," or just your average "good baseball man." As long as they can find something to draw our attention with something dazzling, we'll eventually look away from the man behind the curtain.