You will see absolutely no complaints from me here with this take.
I believe I have been outspoken in how I find the lists and the rating numbers quite silly and outdated. They miss on players all the time and limit the vast scope of differing player growth tendencies and trajectories and what constitutes an entire system. Oftentimes, they regurgitate earlier scouting reports demonstrating they haven't kept abreast with players' improvements or regressions. They create pre-conceived perceptions of players that support uninformed public sentiments (good grief the social media takes and negative remarks on call-ups, as a small example, or trade returns make me nauseous). And, the thing that perhaps annoys me the most is nearly every pundit; beat writer; or talking ahead introduces a player to the public with their ranking first and foremost. "C Gary Dillerson was called up yesterday to replace the injured C Dan Baltzheimer. He's ranked 23rd on MlB Pipeline so, you know, he's Ok.". It's disingenuous. It would be like me introducing you to a friend of mine for the first time with a social credit score without allowing you to introduce yourself or without me telling my friend what it is about you exactly I know or enjoy. "This is Greg. He has a 30-grade in conversationalism. He's not even in my Top 30 of people worth talking to. Essentially irrelevant and I would swap him out for anyone in the office if I had the clout." It's really all quite absurd and I remain amazed it is standard practice.