You didn't really answer the question, if you wouldn't have brought up Sarfate either, what's to debate? If you would have then I would question your motives, you can't bring a pitcher with control issues into an already unsettled situtation, that's the very definition of setting someone up to fail. Again I'm not saying he would be an all-star. My point is that it wasn't handled the best. He was claimed by the Astros and he's now on the Orioles. That tells me the Brewers may have been able to trade him instead of getting nothing in return and adding King for a few weeks. I don't like seeing pitchers walk that way that in my mind still have some potential. That is my entire point. We got something for Thatcher and we got something for Eveland, but Sarfate we got nothing yet he's been on to major league teams since. I would have rather traded him or kept him through the year in case we needed another pitcher and it would also give the Brewers a chance to re-sign him. Obviously if he got major league offers he wouldn't have come back, but the Brewers must not have thought there would be interest in him or they could have simply traded him a few months earlier. I respect your opinion that you don't think Sarfate is very good, but please don't jump to conclusions on certain things. My point has been players can get bored if they're left in the minors too long and hopefully the Brewers make the right decisions and prevent guys like Sarfate from walking away with nothing in return. It just seems to me the majority of the board that posts about Sarfate hates the guy because his dad or step-dad posted here (I don't know if I ever read what he said). I don't think that's fair to Sarfate and he did enjoy the Milwaukee Brewers organization.