I think the system is under rated. We have 3 impact bats in Gamel, Lawrie, and Salome. I realize it's hard to be excited about Salome, but even Lucroy will be a good hitter for a catcher, in that I have no doubt. We have a ton of depth, that's a very good thing. If we can surround a couple of stars with average or better players, the MLB team will be very good. It's not necessary to have an impact bat at every position, I'm unsure why we tend to focus on the position players so much obsessing about getting impact talent at every position. We do have quite a bit of impact pitching in the system, and by impact I mean pitchers who profile to top out in that 1-2 range. I guess what you believe will depend on what you consider to be an impact pitcher. We have plenty of pitchers that could be #2s, and I'd be happy with that. If Rogers will ascend over the course of the season he has the stuff to be a #1, but he's tough to project due to his control. The same could be said of Jeffress, both those guys could be 1s, or they could pitch themselves into relief, or even out of the league. Rivas is over looked by everyone, I think he's in that 2-4 range in MLB. With Peralta making progress on a 3rd pitch, he's comfortably in that 1-4 range, the same can be said of Heckathorn and Arnett. Odorizzi doesn't throw as hard as the other guys, but I think he's in that 2-4 range as a starting pitcher as well. Many are high on Scarpetta because of his CB, I think his ceiling is more a #3, but I'd definitely take that from him. Of course some of these guys will flame out, but we only need to get 3 or 4 of them to pan out, and there's still hope for Parra. Of course I'm leaving out guys like Lasker and Krestalude as well, but we don't know exactly how hard those guys are throwing. I'll have a more informed opinion when I get to see them pitch in person. If we can get back a couple of impact prospects from a Fielder trade and Gamel/Salome get back to playing again I think the system suddenly becomes pretty formidable.