X.. I'm not sure how you can claim we've improved the system. I'm not ignoring Brantley's struggles at AAA, I'm just not sure how relevant that is to the hypothetical discussion we're having or I would have pointed it and then bagged on Dykstra as well. Inman. Thatcher, Brantley, and LaPorta all made it as far as AAA and Garrison would have opened the year in AAA if not for the injury... Frederickson could blow out his arm tomorrow and be done, Dykstra, Walla, and Davis could Josh Murray us... like I said, I assumed the best case scenario fpr discussion purposes... that both sets of prospects continue to develop, it removes all of the "what if" scenarios that are impossible to debate. I will agree that we have higher upside in the system between the picks, but upside doesn't equal production, not yet. I'm not even attempting to debate the prospect issue, it was a side issue, I'm debating the best way to fill a hole on the Major League Roster for a team like Milwaukee. We're a year away in an absolute perfect world from a SP with top of the rotation talent being MLB ready and capable of 180 innings, and I'd rather not push Arnett, Jeffress, or Braddock that hard to get there, even if the organization thinks their arm could handle the workload. So realistically we're more like 2 or 3 years away, but then we'll have a windfall of arms... what's the best way to bridge that gap? 3 rental players? 3 Loopers? Or 1 acquisition for a SP with some longevity to his service in Milwaukee? What's the best way to improve the talent level in the rotation while we wait on the pile of arms at A+ and A ball? Best case scenario we get 60 percent of a season out of rental so we'd need to figure 1.2 seasons of a league average or worse pitcher in the rotation if we go the rental player route, which would mean starting each season with Yo and 4 starters of 3/4/5 quality at best.