Jump to content
Brewer Fanatic

Bottom of ninth, bases loaded, nobody out (changed), down by two. Are you favored to win?


Posted (edited)

I was looking at the MLB scoreboard on my phone tonight. They just installed a new feature saying what team is favored to win and by what percentage at that point of the ballgame. I looked when the Rockies were down by two with nobody out (at first I wrote one out, but there were nobody out) and the bases loaded.

I understand a lot depends on who's pitching and hitting at the time, but generally speaking, who do you think is favored to win and by what percentage, the team that's up or the team that's batting with the bases loaded? I'll give the answer to this thread sometime Sunday night.

Edited by brewcrewreview

Recommended Posts

Posted
I was just looking, and the Rockies didn't have any outs when they were down by 2 with the bases loaded. The first out of the inning was made after the game was tied. So, in that situation (bases loaded, no out, down 2), the Rockies probably had right around a 50% chance to win the game.
Posted
Oh man, my fault. There were no outs in that situation when I looked. So the home team has bases loaded, NOBODY out, down by two, who's favored to win and by what percentage?
Posted (edited)

Here is how the home team has faired in that situation, since 1977:

 

Expectancy: 0.464, 69 games, home team won: 32 times

 

They've won about 46% of the time. Only 69 games in the sample, though, so I'd take that percentage with a grain of salt.

 

Looking at run frequency:

 

http://www.tangotiger.net/RE9902score.html

 

Bases loaded and no out, from 99-02, teams scored over 2 runs about 40% of the time and exactly 2 runs, 21% of the time. The home team wins tied, extra innings games about 52% if the time, so the probability of the home team winning in the above scenario is:

 

40% + .52 x 21% = 51%

 

Run frequency assumes an average pitcher but down in the 9th, the home team often has to face the closer, which is generally an above average pitcher. I'd adjust that 51% down a bit to compensate.

 

 

(edit: added text to long link --1992)

Edited by 1992casey

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Brewer Fanatic Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Brewers community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of Brewer Fanatic.

×
×
  • Create New...