Jump to content
Brewer Fanatic
  • Brewers News & Analysis

    5 Players Milwaukee Brewers Should Trade if They Become Sellers This Summer

    As a team that always has one eye on the future, the Milwaukee Brewers have to start considering what happens if they're just not a playoff-caliber team in 2025. In that case, these five players could be trade bait.

    Matthew Trueblood
    Image courtesy of © Benny Sieu-Imagn Images

    Brewers Video

    It's not a fun scenario to consider. From ownership down to the farm system, the Brewers organization takes great pride in fielding a perennial contender. No one involved therein wants to see the team take a significant step back; they believe they can compete for a playoff berth every season. If you don't count 2020—which you certainly shouldn't—their last losing season was 2016. They're always buyers at the trade deadline. Sometimes, they even make that type of move much sooner than most teams do—most famously, when they acquired Willy Adames in May 2021, but also when they dealt for Aaron Civale at the front end of July last year or when they made such a leap of faith on Quinn Priester last month.

    Rival front offices have heard from the Brewers already this spring (including within the last week) about deals that could be echoes of that memorable Adames deal. Matt Arnold and his staff are being proactive, behind the scenes, to see what's possible. Even as they do so, though, the team on the field looks less and less like one they'll be able to rescue. It might be that, for the first time in almost a decade, the Brewers will need to behave as true sellers at this year's trade deadline.

    Because of the financial constraints of the franchise, though, we already know that they have the right clubs in that bag for that course, too. If it comes to that, without giving up any indispensable parts of the 2026 team, they could land some crucial pieces of a longer-term divisional dynasty. Even at their best, teams like the Brewers (the Guardians, the Rays, etc.) benefit from the occasional opportunity to reset and regroup. This could be that kind of summer. Here are five guys on whom the team will receive lots of calls, if they pivot toward selling off assets in July—and who could net them big value in return.

    Rhys Hoskins
    Let's start simply. In a year when the Red Sox are trying to contend but have lost first baseman Triston Casas for the year; the Mariners lead the AL West despite running out the 2025 versions of Rowdy Tellez and Donovan Solano at first; and every contender in the American League seems to be faking it at DH, Rhys Hoskins would have a good deal of trade value. Hoskins, 32, will be a free agent at season's end, and the Brewers are more likely to have Jake Bauers back or promote Ernesto Martinez Jr. to take over first than to bring Hoskins back in 2026.

    In this platform season, though, Hoskins is enjoying what could be one of the best seasons of his career, even with only four home runs so far. His hard-hit rate would be the best of his career, if the season ended today. His strikeout rate would be close, higher only than in his rookie season of 2017. This season, drag on the ball is greater than it's been since at least 2016, which is steering offense downward and making Hoskins look less like a star than he otherwise might. That phenomenon is affecting the whole league, though, and Hoskins has weathered it much better than you might expect a power-centric fly-ball specialist to.

    Because the Phillies didn't attach a qualifying offer to Hoskins when he departed via free agency after 2023, if he keeps playing this way, the Brewers could make him such an offer this fall and recoup a draft pick if he signs elsewhere. Knowing that, Hoskins would surely prefer to be dealt, because that would pulverize the possibility of a QO, which would be a major drag on his market. For Milwaukee, though, it means that any interested suitor will need to make a strong offer to peel Hoskins away.

    Freddy Peralta
    It might be more natural to think about what Jose Quintana, Civale, or Nestor Cortes could fetch on the market, but there's a reason why the Brewers got Quintana for less than $5 million in early March: he has a skill set most of the league doesn't trust. With huge health questions hanging over Civale, Cortes and Brandon Woodruff, therefore, the only starter with a real chance to bring back huge value is the guy the team surely wants to trade least.

    On the other hand, Freddy Peralta's name was going to be all over the trade rumors ticker this winter, anyway. He's under contract for just one more season, via a club option for 2026, and as the recent cases of Josh Hader, Corbin Burnes and Devin Williams prove, this organization prefers to trade a player for longer-term pieces they believe can help—as opposed to holding them all the way to free agency, even with a mandate to be good every year.

    If they do tumble out of contention as spring gives way to summer, then, the team might consider trading him before the winter. At $8 million, Peralta is priced 200% below his market value. Teams would swarm to him, if the Crew made him available, especially with the promise of two playoff races in which he could play a key role, rather than one. The Astros, Mets, and Yankees (to name just a few) would be interested. Trading Peralta would cut deeply, for the fan base and within the clubhouse. It would have to mark a resolute pivot to a new era for the team. It could, however, bring a return too tantalizing to pass up.

    Nick Mears
    Rarely will the Brewers trade a valuable player with multiple years of team control remaining, and after some refinement this winter and spring, Mears is a valuable piece in the bullpen. He can't become a free agent until after 2027. On the other hand, he's out of options, so he doesn't help a pitching staff stay flexible—a key for building a winning team in a market like the Brewers'. After Arnold and company swooped in and grabbed Mears at a minimal cost last summer, they could get more for him this year than they gave up, even if it's unlikely to be a game-changing return.

    Trevor Megill
    It hasn't quite felt the same, with Megill stepping into the place vacated by Hader, then Williams. He's a fine closer, but he's the bridge between your true heroes—your catalytic bullpen aces, of which the team dearly hopes Craig Yoho will be the next one. If this season does go sour, Megill is the right kind of player to trade a year too soon, rather than a year too late. He could become a very imposing presence in another bullpen, but his performance profile makes it easier to like him as a setup man, anyway, and his health profile makes striking while the iron's hot feel like the right idea.

    Eric Haase
    Good backup catchers are a dime a dozen every winter. By midsummer, though, everyone realizes that the backup catcher they were so confident in actually kind of sucks. Not so with Haase, however. He's enjoying a second consecutive season of good performance and helpful work in the clubhouse, even though he had to spend much of last season providing those things at Triple-A Nashville. He's the type of player who is, inevitably, much more valuable to a winner than to any team in the midst of a transition year. Dealing him wouldn't net a ton, but given the Brewers' preference to invest coaching and player development resources (rather than cash) in the catching spot, it makes more sense to trade him than to hold on and end up cutting ties this offseason.


    This isn't even an exhaustive list of guys whom the team can discuss with other teams this summer, if they turn out not to have the juice. It's the right place to start, though. The way things are trending, the Crew needs to step back and think about how best to build a consistent winner for the next half-decade, again. These five players could be the ones you deal to make that kind of major turn toward the future.

    Follow Brewer Fanatic For Milwaukee Brewers News & Analysis

    • Like 2

    Recent Brewers Articles

    Recent Brewers Videos

    Brewers Top Prospects

    Brandon Sproat

    Milwaukee Brewers - MLB, RHP
    Sproat had a rough first appearance in a Brewers uniform (3 IP, 7 ER, 3 HR). On Thursday, he gave up one run on 4 hits and a walk over 6 2/3 innings. He struck out six Blue Jays batters.

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Featured Comments

    I haven't thrown in the towel with over a 1/2 dozen players on the IL, five months of baseball left and 5 games out.  I wouldn't even say we need a miracle yet.  According to Curt Hogg, The Brewers are planning on re-calling rookie pitcher Logan Henderson from Triple-A Nashville to start Wednesday's series finale against the Cleveland Guardians. 

    • Like 1

     “this organization prefers to trade a player for longer-term pieces they believe can help”

    Yeah, how’s that working for them? We went from a legitimate WS contender to a cellar dweller with that strategy. I understand that we can’t compete long-term with the teams that have 2-3 times our payroll , but in ‘22 a big bat FA could have won Uecker a ring. Now the offense is a hot mess. For decades the Brewers have been pinning their hopes on rookies, who start out well, but fade when opposing pitchers find their weak spot.  We can’t have a team with no veterans. Most of Rhys  Hoskins contract was a waste and now that he’s good you want to trade him? 
    Freddy Peralta has been a reliable pitcher with no significant injuries. Pay the man, or sell the team. 
    Attendance is going down because Charlie Brown is tired of kicking the football, when Lucy’s holding it. 

    • Like 2
    • Disagree 4
    • Love 1
    4 hours ago, Ron750 said:

     “this organization prefers to trade a player for longer-term pieces they believe can help”

    Yeah, how’s that working for them? We went from a legitimate WS contender to a cellar dweller with that strategy. I understand that we can’t compete long-term with the teams that have 2-3 times our payroll , but in ‘22 a big bat FA could have won Uecker a ring. Now the offense is a hot mess. For decades the Brewers have been pinning their hopes on rookies, who start out well, but fade when opposing pitchers find their weak spot.  We can’t have a team with no veterans. Most of Rhys  Hoskins contract was a waste and now that he’s good you want to trade him? 
    Freddy Peralta has been a reliable pitcher with no significant injuries. Pay the man, or sell the team. 
    Attendance is going down because Charlie Brown is tired of kicking the football, when Lucy’s holding it. 

    When we look at the Yelich or Contreras trades, what was one thing that the Brewers did?  They traded... wait for it... prospects!  We traded Ruiz to get Contreras (yes... that was a bit of an anomaly).  Yelich?  They traded Brinson, Isan Diaz, Monte Harrison, and Jordan Yamamoto.  Those are two of the best trades in club history, but the thing they have in common is they were willing to trade prospects.

    I look at the Hader trade for example:  Yes, Ruiz was used to get Contreras.  Gasser was doing well butt they he got hurt.  So he is not contributing to the club.  What is the turnaround for a prospect?  3, 4, 8 years before it is considered good?  Taylor Rogers and Lamet?  What are they doing now?

    Look at the needs -- they need somebody who is going to contribute at the MLB level on the left side of the infield.  I like the article on Bo Bichette that was posted last week.  He is a big piece of the Blue Jay roster, so the Brewers would have to give up some decent prospects.  Wait... we should really try to get him with a case of Spotted Cow and a sack of potatoes because they shouldn't give up their prospects.

    Hey, why don't we trade all of the quality MLB-ready players?  Then the Brewers can have one of the top farm systems and be able to field one of the best AAA-level teams at American Family field.  We all know that every prospect pans out because they rake at Nashville or Biloxi.

     

    1 hour ago, Samurai Bucky said:

    When we look at the Yelich or Contreras trades, what was one thing that the Brewers did?  They traded... wait for it... prospects!  We traded Ruiz to get Contreras (yes... that was a bit of an anomaly).  Yelich?  They traded Brinson, Isan Diaz, Monte Harrison, and Jordan Yamamoto.  Those are two of the best trades in club history, but the thing they have in common is they were willing to trade prospects.

    I look at the Hader trade for example:  Yes, Ruiz was used to get Contreras.  Gasser was doing well butt they he got hurt.  So he is not contributing to the club.  What is the turnaround for a prospect?  3, 4, 8 years before it is considered good?  Taylor Rogers and Lamet?  What are they doing now?

    Look at the needs -- they need somebody who is going to contribute at the MLB level on the left side of the infield.  I like the article on Bo Bichette that was posted last week.  He is a big piece of the Blue Jay roster, so the Brewers would have to give up some decent prospects.  Wait... we should really try to get him with a case of Spotted Cow and a sack of potatoes because they shouldn't give up their prospects.

    Hey, why don't we trade all of the quality MLB-ready players?  Then the Brewers can have one of the top farm systems and be able to field one of the best AAA-level teams at American Family field.  We all know that every prospect pans out because they rake at Nashville or Biloxi.

     

    So you’re saying prospects always fail; therefore prospects have no value; and therefore we should trade all our prospects for the enormously valuable major league stars other teams will eagerly send us in exchange for nothing of value. Am I missing anything?

    I assume you don’t want to trade Peralta for prospects. I don’t know how long you’ve been following the Brewers (I don’t mean that in a snarky way; I literally don’t know how old you are), but it feels like yesterday when some people were furious we traded Adam Lind for prospect Freddy Peralta.  Same with Carlos Gomez, who got us prospect Josh Hader, and Jonathan Lucroy, who got us the highest-ranked prospect we shipped out for Yelich.  BTW, take a look at how Lind, Gomez, and Lucroy did after we traded them.  Or check out Hunter Renfroe’s performance since we swapped him for the at least occasionally useful Elvis Peguero.

    IMHO, baseball players are baseball players. They’ve done what they’ve done, whether they’ve been playing in the majors or the minors, and the name of the game is figuring out what they’re going to do next. Young players run a risk of never panning out; old players run a risk of declining into uselessness. Most players most of the time run a risk of getting hurt or just performing inconsistently. There’s no simple formula for constructing a championship baseball team.

    But if you’re not convinced, then yeah, I’m absolutely sure the Rockies would send us Ryan McMahon for Jesus Made even up.

    • Like 1
    52 minutes ago, gregmag said:

    So you’re saying prospects always fail; therefore prospects have no value; and therefore we should trade all our prospects for the enormously valuable major league stars other teams will eagerly send us in exchange for nothing of value. Am I missing anything?

    I assume you don’t want to trade Peralta for prospects. I don’t know how long you’ve been following the Brewers (I don’t mean that in a snarky way; I literally don’t know how old you are), but it feels like yesterday when some people were furious we traded Adam Lind for prospect Freddy Peralta.  Same with Carlos Gomez, who got us prospect Josh Hader, and Jonathan Lucroy, who got us the highest-ranked prospect we shipped out for Yelich.  BTW, take a look at how Lind, Gomez, and Lucroy did after we traded them.  Or check out Hunter Renfroe’s performance since we swapped him for the at least occasionally useful Elvis Peguero.

    I am probably a little hyperbolic, but if we are not doing well in mid-May, then there seems to be many who say, "Blow it up!  Get as many prospects as you can."

    I would want to trade Peralta for the right reason.  If he was at the end of his contract and the Brewers would have to pay a huge amount of cash, then I think it would be a good idea to move him.  If we are moving him simply because we need to get prospects and rebuild, then I do not agree with that.

    I am not saying prospects have no value.  What I am saying is that just because we get prospects doesn't mean they are necessarily going to equate to something at the MLB level.  There is a bit of a gamble.  In regards to the Adam Lind for Peralta -- that worked out well.  Some do, some don't.  I have seen plenty of articles on how trading for a particular prospect yielded good things two, three, or four generations (trade-speaking) down the road.  When Lucroy was traded, they had Martin Maldonado and Manny Pina behind him (Maldonado couldn't hit his way out of a wet paper bag that year).  Also, the trade was done at the beginning of August, so the Brewers had thrown in the towel -- finishing fourth.

    My (probably incorrect assumption) is that people want to get many prospects because in 2, 3, or 4 years they will be contributing to the big club.  I can't agree that is always the case.

    Perhaps my apprehension towards blowing it up is that the margin is so small for the Brewers.  I have lived through the Brewers crappy period after '82, the Badger football team being terrible in the 70's, the Packers being abysmal, and the Bucks not making the playoffs after Ray Allen and Big Dog left.

    So, I'm on board toward trading veterans for the right reason.  Simply trading veterans to get prospects -- not so much.  If they can pull it off and stay in the playoff hunt (almost) every year, then I'll be on board.



    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...