Jump to content
Brewer Fanatic
  • Brewers News & Analysis

    How Much Money Did Brewers Make in First Sustained Playoff Run Since 2018?

    Losing the NLCS was bound to hurt, but being swept by the Dodgers dealt a special financial gut punch to the Brewers. As they head into the offseason, how much extra cash do they have at hand, thanks to their playoff success?

    Matthew Trueblood
    Image courtesy of © Mark Hoffman/Milwaukee Journal Sentinel / USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images

    Brewers Video

    Since the start of the 2022 season, the Brewers have played 14 postseason games. The division-rival Chicago Cubs have played just eight, all of them coming this fall. However, the two clubs have played the same number of "cash cow" games, under the rules that govern the distribution of postseason revenue throughout MLB. The inability to put up a significant fight against the Dodgers not only meant the end of their magical season and the evaporation of any dreams of the franchise's first World Series championship, but also a missed opportunity to make tens of millions more dollars.

    Though there's lots of money to be made from any playoff appearance—and especially from any home games—the biggest chunks for individual teams come when a series goes beyond its minimum required length. For the first two games of the Wild Card Series; the first three games of the Division Series; and the first four games of both the League Championship Series and the World Series, the two teams playing divide only a small portion of the gate receipts. Most of the money for those games goes to the Commissioner's office and (the greater share) to the players; that's where the playoff shares you hear about each fall come from. If there's a Game 3 in a Wild Card Series; Games 4 and 5 in the Division Series; or Games 5 through 7 in the LCS or World Series, the two teams playing divide roughly 85% of the gate. 

    In other words, for sold-out Games 3 and 4 at Dodger Stadium, the Brewers only got (as a rough estimate) $3 million. They probably made more like $2 million at the gate for Games 1 and 2 at the smaller, lower-priced Uecker Field. By contrast, Game 5 could have netted the Brewers a solid $5 million by itself, and Games 6 and 7 would have been worth nearly as much, in gates alone.

    Because the Brewers were also swept in the 2023 Wild Card Series, the only playoff games they've played that have netted them these larger shares in the last three trips they've made to October were Game 3 against the Mets last fall and Games 4 and 5 against the Cubs earlier this month. That's better than nothing—and Wrigley Field, though short on capacity, charges very high ticket prices, so that was a very lucrative game to get nearly half the revenue from. Still, the Crew likely only made about $15 million in attendance revenue during this playoff run.

    Attendance, of course, is not the whole story. The Brewers hosted five games, which means they got to fill their team-owned parking lots and hawk merchandise and concessions five times. They'll also realize some ancillary benefits, like a stronger season ticket base (new signups, plus a boost in renewal rates) and better marketing and advertising rates. Beating the Cubs, in particular; getting the monkey off their back by winning a playoff series for the first time in seven years; and advancing to an NLCS against the extremely high-visibility Dodgers all increase their earning power. 

    The Brewers are probably $30 million richer for having done as well as they did this season, including in October. That's not all in cash, and they won't realize all of those benefits right away, but that's a decent estimate of the number. It's a great thing to keep in mind, as the team heads into an offseason in which they'll have some key holes to fill but plenty of money coming off the books. Significant raises are due for arbitration-eligible youngsters Brice Turang and William Contreras, and under the terms of Jackson Chourio's team-friendly contract extension. However, Rhys Hoskins headlines a list of veterans who will hit free agency. Right now, the Crew's projected payroll for next season is only around $75 million. They could easily add $50 million in talent via free agency this winter. 

    Mark Attanasio and the ownership group authorized payrolls over $130 million in both 2022 and 2023, but they've pared that back to $98 million and $115 million in 2024 and 2025, respectively. That happened even as attendance increased, which it's almost sure to do again in 2026. Given the money they just made this fall and any reasonable revenue projection for next season, the Brewers should be back over $125 million next year, which means that they can go make aggressive moves in free agency or on the trade market. That kind of freedom, for a team that also has a cadre of young stars and one of the game's best farm systems, should scare even the mighty Dodgers.

    Follow Brewer Fanatic For Milwaukee Brewers News & Analysis

    • Like 2
    • Love 1

    Recent Brewers Articles

    Recent Brewers Videos

    Brewers Top Prospects

    Braylon Payne

    Wisconsin Timber Rattlers - A+, OF
    On Thursday, the 2024 top pick went 2-for-3 with two walks, with his fourth steal, and his second home run of the season. He's hitting .320 (1.029 OPS) in 8 games.

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Featured Comments

    Yeah... I just don't know where that money goes to be honest. Brandon Woodruff now that he's proven his SHOULDER is healthy? 

    One thing I love about the Packers is... nobody is buying a Yacht after a playoff run(I mean, maybe Jordan Love did, but generally speaking). 

    That money goes into a "rainy day fund."

    How nice would it be... and probably a disaster, but in theory, if the Brewers were bought by Milwaukee County... with the guarantee that they could not take money from the fund and they appointed a board of directors?

     

    Or just... get interested in Baseball Paul Menard! C'mon... it's much more interesting now! Jimmy Haslem?

    I know I'm getting REAL tired of Dodgers fans on X saying "the Brewers could have signed Blake Snell, Ohtani, Freeman and Glasnow if they wanted." 

    And then, one guy even had the nerve to say the Dodgers are able to get by with "cheap" players like Teo. For those who are curious, he'd have been our highest paid player when they picked him up on the scrap heap for a meager 23.5M dollars. 

     

    This was a bit of an opportunity lost... to make some money, but the Brewers couldn't beat this Dodgers team. EVERYTHING went right in Gm1. A 410 Foot Double Play, they load the bases and throw the ball so far inside it's almost impossible to not get hit by it(not blaming Turang, it's called a reaction for a reason... but...damn it Turang, get hit).


    Mostly I'm just resigned to the fact that EVERYTHING has to go right for the Brewers and the Dodgers just need a moderate amount of good luck. If Snell or Glasnow or Ohtani wouldn't have been able to pitch or even two of them, they'd still be turning to electric young arms with stuff slotting in somewhere between Miz and Patrick, they just don't need to. 

    Ohtani can go 1 for 20 and the Dodgers can weather that storm until he decides to have the greatest game in playoff history. Turang struggles along with Yelich and... we couldn't be able to buy a run with Tim Dongahy calling the game and a bank account the size of Elon Musks.

    Not seeing much of an increase in payroll for the ‘26 season, not with less local TV revenue and a looming lockout in ‘27.

    Thinking near the same payroll as what they had in ‘25, so they can set aside a nice sum for a lockout war-chest.

    Would we have had a better shot if the Phil’s didn’t ‘throw away’ that series and tangled with them? We did get smoked by them at the end of the season, and we clearly weren’t playing our best ball of the year, but talented teams turn it up when it they have to. Phil’s and LA played really well when it counted and are stacked. 
     

    I do agree that to make the leap, we won’t be able to do so with the current ownership. Mark and team have done a great job getting us this far, but it’s time to let go and let the next phase and deeper pockets to take over. Look at the last 10 years of World Series winners and count the teams that weren’t in the top 10  payrolls. Just saying.

    The stinking Angels make more money in TV contracts alone without selling a ticket than the Brewers make with every single thing they do.

    It isn't the owner.   He's doing everything he can do that still makes business sense and don't kid yourself, it's all about the business for every team.  If we had the Dodgers owner it would be the same thing. 

     

    MLB needs a cap system like the NFL has, or in the very least far greater revenue sharing with penalties like losing your international money and draft picks for going over certain thresh holds.  

     

    Problem is the commish is an employee of the owners, and the 8 or 9 big market big money teams are going to keep the rigging exactly as it is.  Manfred like Selig will do what he's told if he wants to continue sitting on their lap.

    • Like 1
    5 minutes ago, Trax said:

    The stinking Angels make more money in TV contracts alone without selling a ticket than the Brewers make with every single thing they do.

    It isn't the owner.   He's doing everything he can do that still makes business sense and don't kid yourself, it's all about the business for every team.  If we had the Dodgers owner it would be the same thing. 

     

    MLB needs a cap system like the NFL has, or in the very least far greater revenue sharing with penalties like losing your international money and draft picks for going over certain thresh holds.  

     

    Problem is the commish is an employee of the owners, and the 8 or 9 big market big money teams are going to keep the rigging exactly as it is.  Manfred like Selig will do what he's told if he wants to continue sitting on their lap.

    Mark has done a lot to strengthen the organization on the developmental side, but he has done very little to connect with the fanbase, including zero public appearances in Wisconsin cities outside Milwaukee. The International League could use a fourth northern team to form rivalries with St. Paul, Des Moines and Omaha. And, given that Nashville is on the cusp of losing its Triple A team in exchange for a MLB franchise, it would make sense for the Brewers to want to anchor their top affiliate close to home. Madison, the fastest-growing metro area in the state, would be ideal if Mark hit up Madison-based American Family Insurance to share the cost of a 12,000-seat ballpark so he could showcase the Brewers' next great prospects before they reach Milwaukee. Mark, or stand-in Rick Schlesinger, need to participate in the ongoing development study of the AmFam Field parking lots. At the very least, two hotels need to be built there to serve stadium events, the State Fair, Summerfest and downtown. And let's give the tailgaters an incentive to come indoors by building a huge beer hall -- Miller Hall -- that would connect the neighborhood brewery with the stadium and be Milwaukee's answer to St. Louis' Ballpark Village. 

    • Like 3
    8 minutes ago, Snoebird said:

    Mark has done a lot to strengthen the organization on the developmental side, but he has done very little to connect with the fanbase, including zero public appearances in Wisconsin cities outside Milwaukee. The International League could use a fourth northern team to form rivalries with St. Paul, Des Moines and Omaha. And, given that Nashville is on the cusp of losing its Triple A team in exchange for a MLB franchise, it would make sense for the Brewers to want to anchor their top affiliate close to home. Madison, the fastest-growing metro area in the state, would be ideal if Mark hit up Madison-based American Family Insurance to share the cost of a 12,000-seat ballpark so he could showcase the Brewers' next great prospects before they reach Milwaukee. Mark, or stand-in Rick Schlesinger, need to participate in the ongoing development study of the AmFam Field parking lots. At the very least, two hotels need to be built there to serve stadium events, the State Fair, Summerfest and downtown. And let's give the tailgaters an incentive to come indoors by building a huge beer hall -- Miller Hall -- that would connect the neighborhood brewery with the stadium and be Milwaukee's answer to St. Louis' Ballpark Village. 

    Absolutely spot on and would love to see all of that happen.  My comments were strictly about player payroll.  

    2 minutes ago, Trax said:

    Absolutely spot on and would love to see all of that happen.  My comments were strictly about player payroll.  

    From what I gather (Washington Post), Rob Manfred wants to overhaul MLB's TV structure by buying out the big markets' networks, putting all networks under the MLB umbrella and sharing revenue evenly among teams. His goal is to increase the value of the small market teams and allow them to compete with the giants, thereby making the regular season more attractive. And the carrot he has to dangle is worldwide streaming capability. In exchange for TV revenue sharing, the 48 percent of local revenue that MLB collects from teams would end. I think Manfred could get around the need for a salary cap by toughening up the luxury tax tiers, so maybe just a salary floor could be added, although he currently shows no interest in that.

    On 10/20/2025 at 11:41 AM, Snoebird said:

    Madison, the fastest-growing metro area in the state, would be ideal if Mark hit up Madison-based American Family Insurance to share the cost of a 12,000-seat ballpark so he could showcase the Brewers' next great prospects before they reach Milwaukee. 

    I believe that with the smallest metro market, a AAA team in Madison is too close. Brewers need to be a statewide team. I'm not sure how much of their business comes from Madison and SW Wisconsin, but it can't be insignificant. Some people would probably skip the drive to MKE if there was a AAA team here.

    I don't include myself in that group. I live in Madison, and I don't think I would attend a Madison Brewers game instead of driving to Milwaukee. I haven't been to a Mallards game in over 10 years, because the novelty wore off. I like that I can see baseball at the highest level in a relatively easy fashion.

    I would be curious to see how the markets with a AAA team close to the big-league club have their attendance affected. St. Paul/Minneapolis, Seattle/Tacoma, Detroit/Toledo, for example.



    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...