Jump to content
Brewer Fanatic
  • Brewers News & Analysis

    PECOTA Hates the Brewers Again, and is Especially Rude to Brice Turang

    The preseason projections put out by FanGraphs and Baseball Prospectus are the thoughtful and objective work of smart, reasonably unbiased people. But boy, do they feel disrespectful sometimes.

    Matthew Trueblood
    Image courtesy of © Mark Hoffman/Milwaukee Journal Sentinel / USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images

    Brewers Video

    Baseball Prospectus posted their PECOTA projections for 2026 on Tuesday, including projected standings and playoff odds. For Brewers fans, the news is not good. The Cubs are not only favorites to win the division, but project for 90.5 wins—a full 10 games clear of the 80.5 victories for which the system pegs the Brewers. The system gives the Crew just a 10.5% chance to win their fourth straight NL Central crown, and only a 31.2% shot to make the playoffs at all. This feeling is familiar, but not fun, even though the story tends to end with Milwaukee far outstripping their projected win total.

    Last week, FanGraphs posted their own projections and playoff odds, which are (technically) more optimistic about the Brewers. It gives them an 82-win projection. However, in that version of the projected standings, the Cubs are still first (albeit at a more reachable win total) and the Pirates sneak in just ahead of Milwaukee, for second place. That's a jarring snapshot of where things stand as Brewers personnel gather in Maryvale. They're not only not the favorites, but very much the underdogs in the fight to sustain their regional dynasty.

    For PECOTA, at least, the problems the Brewers face lie in run production, rather than run prevention. The model expects Milwaukee pitchers to be better than average, and for them to be about 11 runs better than average when combining fielding and baserunning. However, the team's projected DRC+ is just 96, where 100 is average and higher is better. It's a dreary outlook, even for a team that prides itself more on good pitching and defense than on slugging.

    Two things about the projection stand out especially starkly. Firstly, PECOTA hates Brice Turang. I mean, it hates him. The model projects an 87 DRC+ and a .238/.311/.360 batting line for Turang. It sees him hitting 13 homers in 630 plate appearances, which would represent a small step backward after 2025, but the extent of the setback that overall line would be is much greater. Turang batted .288/.359/.435 in 2025. Admittedly, he hit just .254/.316/.349 in 2024, but even that line is essentially equal in value to the one he's forecasted to produce this season—and it ignores his breakout year altogether, despite that being the most recent and relevant data about what he'll do next. 

    Systems can be designed for varying levels of sensitivity to sub-surface adjustments, like the way Turang increased his bat speed in 2025 and traded some contact for better power, but they can't be tweaked in specific cases; the risk of compromising the methodological integrity of the model is too great. Thus, PECOTA's wariness about Turang is understandable, and perhaps even a necessary evil. Nonetheless, to best predict what the Brewers will do in 2026, one should mentally adjust Turang's expected offensive output upward by about 10 runs.

    Secondly, the Brewers set themselves back Monday by trading Caleb Durbin, as far as PECOTA is concerned. Durbin, now with the Red Sox, is projected for a 104 DRC+, with a .254/.332/.377 line. If the system is to be believed, Milwaukee will sorely miss those on-base skills.

    Player AVG OBP SLG DRC+
    Caleb Durbin .254 .332 .377 104
    Andruw Monasterio .234 .306 .356 86
    Joey Ortiz .248 .307 .392 96
    Jett Williams .235 .314 .387 96
    David Hamilton .223 .292 .357 77
    Tyler Black .197 .296 .338 75

    David Hamilton will bring more speed and better up-the-middle defense off the bench than did Andruw Monasterio, but Monasterio is projected to be the better hitter. Meanwhile, neither Joey Ortiz nor Jett Williams is expected to replace what Durbin (with his elite contact rate and knack for getting hit by pitches) brought to the Milwaukee lineup. Barring a move for an external solution at third base, the Brewers downgraded somewhat significantly by trading Durbin and Monasterio to Boston. It's nice to have better pitching depth than ever, but it might not be enough to justify having moved on so quickly from a player with long-term team control and such a high baseline for performance.

    Sharp-eyed readers will notice that both Ortiz and Williams are projected to outhit Turang, according to PECOTA. That just reinforces the jarring nature of Turang's projection. It feels indefensibly wrong, but it does highlight an important truth: using more than one year of data (where it's available) makes projections better. What happened last is not always what should be expected to happen next. Turang's projection probably is too low, but that doesn't mean that Ortiz's is unduly optimistic. The best-case scenario, then, is that the Brewers make some other addition to shore up the infield mix, but also get this version of Ortiz (one very much akin to the player he was in 2024) and the improved version of Turang. That still won't get them to 90 wins, but it'll start them on the journey there. The team will have to find other players who outdo their projections, too, but that's rarely a problem for the unassuming superpower of the NL Central. At least Pat Murphy won't be hurting for bulletin board material this spring, should he want some.

    Follow Brewer Fanatic For Milwaukee Brewers News & Analysis

    Recent Brewers Articles

    Recent Brewers Videos


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Featured Comments

    6 hours ago, Matthew Trueblood said:

    That's a jarring snapshot of where things stand as Brewers personnel gather in Maryvale. They're not only not the favorites, but very much the underdogs in the fight to sustain their regional dynasty.

    Not jarring at all. It's been the same story the last two seasons. Also pretty sure PECOTA is actually projecting the Brewers more wins in 2026 than they did in 2025.

    • Like 2

    Expecting Turang to not live up to his 2025 numbers offensively is perfectly reasonable. Probably even likely. But projecting him to be worse than his overall career numbers is something I just can't fathom. It's not even DRC+ not believing the slash line wasn't deserved, it's DRC+ not believing in DRC+. Aaron Ashby's projection is perhaps even more insane; 27 years old, career 83 DRA- and 85 cFIP, coming off a 73 DRA- and 76 cFIP season. Velo and Stuff+ took a big step forward and were excellent too. Naturally, PECOTA projects a 98 DRA-, expecting him to be far, far worse than his career norms and put up his worst season so far. 

    I'm not some anti-projections type of guy, I find them very useful and I put a lot of stock in them. But PECOTA has been so comically wrong about the Brewers the past couple of years. I think they've been off by 14 and then 17 games the last two years. Clearly there is something about their recent/current crop of players the model and/or their depth charts model cannot handle. PECOTA isn't alone in this, other projection systems were off by a lot too, but it is PECOTA we're talking about here. 

    Regression to the mean is a key part of projections. But I don't know how reasonable it is that, at a quick glance, that it expects every pitcher with a better than average DRA- to be worse than their career average (Often significantly so, and in one case, Zerpa, go from 88 DRA- to 113), and every pitcher with a worse than average career DRA- to improve. It seemingly has zero faith in even its own model. Regressing hard towards the league average is probably a good way to get the overall accuracy of your system up, because that generally is what happens. But it also seems kinda pointless, and tells you nothing about any individual. At that point, wouldn't Marcel just be better with a lot less work? 

    On the hitter side it at least seems less generic. Like it expects Chourio to be significantly better than his career numbers to date (by DRC+), it expects Contreras to be better than his. And while it expects Yelich and Sanchez to be much worse than their career numbers, it's not entirely unreasonable given their age. Some headscratching one there too, but overall I think it's fine to expect fewer runs scored even if I disagree with the scale. 

    Anyway, probably not much point going on here. Projection systems don't do well with the Brewers, and at least some projection makers acknowledge that and try to figure out why. Dan Z made some adjustments, BP mostly seem to shrug and say that small market teams are impossible to project well, but at least they acknowledge it. 

    What frustrates me more are the "experts" and media types and writers who are so unwilling to learn though. They predict the Brewers to suck every year because they don't do things traditionally and therefore it must be bad. They then say something about how the Brewers always manage to surprise us and that perhaps we should expect it. And then they predict them to suck again. Some attempts to understand why they are so wrong over and over would be appreciated. Clearly Brewers don't just get lucky 8+ years in a row, there is method to the "madness". Yet very little interest in the actual how.

    • Like 4


    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...