Lathund
Verified Member-
Posts
1,904 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
4
Lathund's Achievements
-
This is Chourio's age 22 season. When PCA finished his age 22 season, his was .228/.282/.370 (81 wRC+) for his career. Still 2.4 fWAR due to defense. Point being that a lot can happen in two years. Right now it's PCA, but I also don't buy that this hot streak is who he is as a hitter. And I also think there's more to come from Jackson.
-
I think that with his stuff, even marginally better command makes him a viable MLB player. The harder part to figure out might be the inconsistency, or how one mistake seemingly becomes a second, and a third. I think the best way to use him in AAA would still be to keep him reasonably stretched out, but coming in as a reliever, to see how he handles that routine.
-
BREAKING: Brewers Trade For Dustin May And JoJo Romero
Lathund replied to Steve Drumwright's topic in Milwaukee Brewers Talk
It's hard to sell at the deadline for a contending team. The timing of the Hader trade didn't exactly play out very well, Or you might not get the opportunity to trade them due to injuries (to them, or other pitchers on the roster), or due to being in a tight division race and so on. So I feel like you have to decide in the offseason how set you are on trading them, how you'd feel if you didn't manage to. Any player you feel like you have to trade, do it in the offseason. Ones where you'd like to trade them, but would be OK either way, you could leave until midseason. For a non-contending team, it's not as clear cut. -
BREAKING: Brewers Trade For Dustin May And JoJo Romero
Lathund replied to Steve Drumwright's topic in Milwaukee Brewers Talk
After getting over the initial shock, my thoughts are mostly that I'm OK with including Ragsdale. I'm not buying that he's suddenly a power hitter, and I think the accompanying strikeout rate is more likely to stick than the power is. Still, he's a good prospect, but with Lara, Chourio and Mitchell already here, and Payne/Adamczewski in the system, it's the kind of good prospect that I get you have to include in trades. Not a fan of including Frias at all though. He is so far away from the majors that there is a lot of risk with him, but my philosophy is generally that the players with the big-time tools, you keep. It's the only way you can get your homegrown superstars. So I'd have prefered someone else in there, this feels like an overpay. At the same time though I can see the logic. We have other outfielders, and including Frias won't hurt us for several more years even if he does make it big (and he might never). Im glad it wasn't Josh Knoth; I feel it's vital that we keep our best pitching prospects around. So I'm in the camp of "I don't like it, but it's not the disaster I initially thought it was". -
BREAKING: Brewers Trade For Dustin May And JoJo Romero
Lathund replied to Steve Drumwright's topic in Milwaukee Brewers Talk
For two rentals??!?! Why??? -
Pitched full reliever workloads (between 62 and 69 appearances eahc year) from 2021-2024, made 31 starts (33 appearances total) last year. Getting hit with that line drive seems like the only absence he's had in the last 6 years. Hardly what I'd call injury prone. Every pitcher is an injury waiting to happen, but he doesn't strike me as any more injury prone than normal.
-
The decline on both sides of the ball in the last couple of seasons is why I'm perfectly fine just letting the contract run out after next season, and only re-sign in free agency if a reasonable short-term deal can be agreed to. So in other words, most likely not re-signing. We obviously don't know if this is the start of his decline, or something temporary, but I'd rather not risk signing a catcher for big money into his mid 30s with this trend.
-
Brewers (Misiorowski) vs Angels (Urena): 8/2/26, 3:15pm
Lathund replied to Brock Beauchamp's topic in Archived Game Threads
I couldn't tell you about Brewers.tv, but for someone based outside the US with mlb.tv, the game is unavailable. And Peacock is US only, so couldn't pay to watch the game even if I wanted to. -
The way I look at it, in the postseason Brewers could get far by improving relief pitching. The starting pitching is good, and shorter starts are less of an issue when your A bullpen can pitch basically every game. With Skubal gone, there also aren't really any starters who are a clear upgrade. And starters, especially with control remaining, are expensive. Adrian Morejon (If the Padres are selling) and Luke Weaver would be ideal IMO. There are other names out there, but those would be among the best relievers who might be available. Having a lead in the 5th and getting to close it out with Morejon, Weaver, Uribe, Megill sounds like a good plan to me. A rental reliever, even a very good one, won't require a true top prospect. Weaver has another year of control, but is paid near market rate so doesn't add a ton of value or cost. Adding another starter to help get the team to the postseason could also be a good idea, but I wouldn't shop at the very top of the market for that. A Freddy reunion if the price is right perhaps.
-
Obviously not an exact science, and would vary a lot between what source you go on. And what really matters is how the teams view these guys; presumably they liked these guys better than the consensus, and the guys in the alternative packages less. The Athletic (Keith Law): Hope 26th, Ryan 41st. He has Luis Peña 21st and Alexander Frias 69th. So those two + a better third piece. Pipeline: Hope 25th, Ryan 68th, Brady Smith 17th in Dodgers sytem. Brewers: Peña 18th, Lara 64th. Blake Burke is 17th, Ethan Dorchies is the closest pitcher at 19th. Fangraphs: Ryan 22nd, Hope 57th, Brady Smith 23rd in system with 40+ FV. Luis Peña is 26th, with Frias 43rd and Brady Ebel 63rd. Brewers lowest 40+ are Strosnider and Trey Ebel. 40+ Pitchers are Dubanewicz, Thompson, Wichrowski. Can't be bothered to check more sources at this time, but roughly speaking it would be Peña, whoever you think the Brewers 3rd best prospect is (Lara, Frias), and whoever you have as the Brewers 4th best pitching prospect after Hardin/Letson/Knoth.
-
That's a deal I could live with. I'd still prefer to go after more controllable players instead, or somewhat cheaper rentals, but it's the kind of deal that doesn't really hurt us in the short term. I like both Ragsdale and Fischer, but Brewers have other power-hitting corner IF (Made if he stays at 3B, Adams and Burke, and others further way), and both no immediate OF need (Lara and Chourio for the long term, Mitchell for the next few years) and other good OF prospects (Adamczewski, Payne, Frias etc).
-
People bring up that it's against the Brewers' historical MO to pay actual money to relievers, but I don't think his 2027 salary really is that big of an issue. For a few reasons, one is that it's just one year, and even if it's not what the Brewers do, 1 year $11m for Weaver is better value than most "big" reliever contracts that are signed every offseason. Another is that, barring serious injury, they could trade him again if need be. Third is that with Woodruff coming off the books (Plus I believe his buyout, and that of Hoskins and Quintana, counted towards this year) they do have room for it. And this is a fairly complete team without any major holes; their only FAs are Bauers (Vaughn + Adams/Burke/Fischer can replace), Woodruff and Sanchez (Quero/Wood or a cheap FA backup). So they don't need to spend much elsewhere either. Which means that they could do it. I know the reporting is that the Mets won't pay down salary, but I don't think that's true. At least not for 1 year like this. So a slightly better return could see any remaining salary issue go away. Weaver + Morejon would be a fantastic deadline. Henderson only going 4-5 innings really wouldn't be an issue if you can turn it over to Weaver, Uribe, Megill and Morejon every time in the postseason.
-
Truly Outlandish, Non-Sensical Trade Suggestions
Lathund replied to Jake McKibbin's topic in Transaction Rumors & Proposals
They are a smart and well run organization, who normally don't trade top prospects for rentals. But I think the circumstances are right for them to be willing to go bigger than usual. For one thing they have like 6 top 100 outfield prospects. They could keep the three they like the most, and still put together a trade package that not many teams could beat. They're also getting old. Freeman, Betts, Muncy, Teoscar, as well as some bench guys like Kiké and Rojas, will all be in their age 34 or older seasons next year. Some of the pitchers (Snell, Glasnow) are also getting on, and already injury prone. With how well run they are, and how much revenue the team brings in, they'll always be able to be competitive, but they probably have a better chance this year than next. And that's even if the CBA is agreed to on time, and doesn't particularly change the system against the Dodgers. So while I don't think they'll bid for the sake of driving up the price, I think they're willing to go higher than they have in the past. -
What exactly is the point of that versatility though? We have an infield backup who can play 2B, 3B and SS, we have 4 outfielders who can play all three OF positions. You want a super versatile player on the bench for when you have lots of specialists, as that's the only way to make that plausible. But the Brewers don't. Martinez has played several different positions, but he doesn't play any of them well, and he's a worse hitter than anyone he'd be replacing. He would be behind Hamilton/Ortiz as the backup infielder, and he's much worse than Mitchell... so then just keep Mitchell? For a versatile player to add value they have to actually be good defenders or good hitters. Martinez and Castro are both poor defenders. Martinez has a career 79 wRC+ and an even worse .271 xwOBA. Castro is slightly better with a 95 wRC+ and an xwOBA to match, but he's also a far worse defender and baserunner. Depth and versatility are big parts of what Brewers do well, and what helps them win. But this is not the way to go about it. The team is just straight up worse with Castro instead of Ortiz and Martinez instead of Mitchell. And if the point is to get something else along with them.. well Brewers have dozens of fairly minor prospects who can get an arm in return. Doing things like this, or extending Hernan Perez for 6 years and $36m (or w/e it was) aren't what will improve the Brewers. Zigging when others zag, or thinking outside the box, are good things. But this is running in circles or forgetting what a box even is for. As for Rodden... sure. Infield depth in the minors, why not. But it's more a case of a throw-in on a trade you were doing anyway, and not someone to target. Lots of players like him out there.
- 26 replies
-
- 3
-
-
-
- angel martinez
- brock rodden
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
Brewers (Pannone) vs Giants (Webb): 7/29/26, 2:45pm
Lathund replied to Brock Beauchamp's topic in Archived Game Threads
Yeah, I always dread the Logan Webb starts, tends to be a miserable experience. At some point we will have some success against him, I just really hope it'll be today...

